- 1、本文档共8页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
third district court of appeal - florida attorney general
Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2007
Opinion filed April 25, 2007.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D05-2244
Lower Tribunal No. 04-487
________________
South Motor Company of Dade County, a Florida corporation, d/b/a South Motors Honda,
Appellant,
vs.
Edith Doktorczyk, Personal Representative of the Estate of Menachem Doktorczyk,
Appellee.
On a Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Kevin Emas, Ivan Fernandez, and Henry Leyte-Vidal, Judges.
Goldsmith Atlas, P.A. and Glen R. Goldsmith; Greenberg Traurig, P.A., and Elliot H. Scherker, and Elliot B. Kula, for petitioner.
George, Hartz, Lundeen Fulmer, Johnstone, King Stevens, and Esther E. Galicia (Ft. Lauderdale), for respondent.
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
Before, GERSTEN, GREEN, and RAMIREZ, JJ.
RAMIREZ, J.
Upon consideration of petitioner South Motor Company of Dade County’s motion for rehearing, we grant the motion for rehearing. Accordingly, we withdraw this Court’s September 1, 2006 opinion, and substitute the following in its stead.
South Motor petitioned for a writ of certiorari seeking to quash a decision of the Circuit Court Appellate Division in which the circuit court reversed a summary judgment entered by the county court based on the expiration of the statute of limitations. Certiorari review is appropriate here where the circuit court appellate division has applied the incorrect law. Allstate Ins. Co. v. Kaklamanos, 843 So. 2d 885, 889 (Fla. 2003); Miami-Dade County v. Omnipoint Holdings, Inc., 863 So. 2d 195, 199 (Fla. 2003); Auerbach v. City of Miami, 929 So. 2d 693, 694-95 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Morningside Civic Ass’n, Inc. v. City of Miami Comm’n, 917 So. 2d 293, 295 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005).
In its discussion of the second-level certiorari standard, the Florida Supreme Court has recognized that second-level review is not intended to serve as a second appeal, and that th
您可能关注的文档
- strongstudystrong questions anthony wood, the russian revolution.doc
- students' perspectives on debate exercises in content area.doc
- students’ conceptions of statistics a phenomenographic strongstudystrong.doc
- student profile supporting analysis gippsland tertiary.doc
- summary of literature review - western illinois university.doc
- super-sized multiplies how do fpgas fare in extended digit.doc
- supersizing the mind embodiment, action, and cognitive.doc
- summary of findings - department of civil engineering.doc
- supplement 1technical features of the x-tail pcr assay.doc
- supplemental material and method - plos biology.doc
最近下载
- PE 中石化 PEM1850A datasheet 物性表文件明细.pdf
- 上海六年级第二学期期末考试数学试卷3套(含答案)最新沪教版.doc
- SL_T 523-2024 水土保持监理规范.docx
- 筑业四川省建筑工程资料管理软件教你如何填写资料以及填写范例参照.pdf
- 胸腔闭式引流管意外脱管的原因分析及护理对策.doc
- 铁路建设项目概算清理重点内容探讨.doc
- PLY配料控制器说明书内容解读.doc
- 关于当地行道树调查及应用探讨.doc VIP
- 2023年嘉兴市清华附中嘉兴实验学校招聘事业编制教师考试真题.pdf
- 一级注册计量师考试:2022计量专业案例分析真题模拟及答案(1).doc VIP
文档评论(0)