third district court of appeal - florida attorney general.docVIP

third district court of appeal - florida attorney general.doc

  1. 1、本文档共8页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
third district court of appeal - florida attorney general

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2007 Opinion filed April 25, 2007. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D05-2244 Lower Tribunal No. 04-487 ________________ South Motor Company of Dade County, a Florida corporation, d/b/a South Motors Honda, Appellant, vs. Edith Doktorczyk, Personal Representative of the Estate of Menachem Doktorczyk, Appellee. On a Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Kevin Emas, Ivan Fernandez, and Henry Leyte-Vidal, Judges. Goldsmith Atlas, P.A. and Glen R. Goldsmith; Greenberg Traurig, P.A., and Elliot H. Scherker, and Elliot B. Kula, for petitioner. George, Hartz, Lundeen Fulmer, Johnstone, King Stevens, and Esther E. Galicia (Ft. Lauderdale), for respondent. ON MOTION FOR REHEARING Before, GERSTEN, GREEN, and RAMIREZ, JJ. RAMIREZ, J. Upon consideration of petitioner South Motor Company of Dade County’s motion for rehearing, we grant the motion for rehearing. Accordingly, we withdraw this Court’s September 1, 2006 opinion, and substitute the following in its stead. South Motor petitioned for a writ of certiorari seeking to quash a decision of the Circuit Court Appellate Division in which the circuit court reversed a summary judgment entered by the county court based on the expiration of the statute of limitations. Certiorari review is appropriate here where the circuit court appellate division has applied the incorrect law. Allstate Ins. Co. v. Kaklamanos, 843 So. 2d 885, 889 (Fla. 2003); Miami-Dade County v. Omnipoint Holdings, Inc., 863 So. 2d 195, 199 (Fla. 2003); Auerbach v. City of Miami, 929 So. 2d 693, 694-95 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Morningside Civic Ass’n, Inc. v. City of Miami Comm’n, 917 So. 2d 293, 295 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). In its discussion of the second-level certiorari standard, the Florida Supreme Court has recognized that second-level review is not intended to serve as a second appeal, and that th

文档评论(0)

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档