二次开粗方法的比较和选择(国外英语资料).doc

二次开粗方法的比较和选择 Comparison and selection of.Txt two rough methods of Ming Sao is easy to hide, dark base to prevent. Buddha said: you two are silly, B!! When the night is turned on the bed again, the sun is born, and the comparison and choice of the two opening methods are made Selection A lot of friends are confused about the choice of the two rough method, and I sum up according to my experience and understanding. Two rough general including conventional method and non conventional methods, such as conventional use 3D, unconventional pruning, we can according to the characteristics of the parts and personal habits and experience to choose the most reasonable way. Here are some main general ways for your reference. 3D uses IPW for two coarse features: 1, knife rail calculation time is long; 2, may produce more empty knife; 3, there is a correlation with the upper process, and if the previous process changes, then the current operation must be re generated calculation. Use layer based IPW for two boot features: 1, the calculation time of tool path is less than 3D; 2, the generated cutter path is more regular than the 3D cutter path; 3. Cutting corners and stepped surfaces in previous operations can be efficiently cut; 4, you can use a larger tool in the rough machining to complete a deep cut, and then in the following operation, the same tool to complete a very shallow cutting, to clear the ladder surface. Use reference tool for two times to open rough features: 1, the calculation time of tool rail is reduced by two times with IWP; 2. Machining only the corner area of the remaining material; 3. Select the diameter of the reference tool must be greater than the diameter of the tool used in the previous process. 4, there is no correlation with the upper process, so it is easy to edit and modify the cutting parameters. The use of reference tool two times thick, only cutting the corner area of the remaining material, fast calculation speed, two rough machining efficiency i