保水剂种类及含量对土壤水分蒸发的影响.pdfVIP

32 4 ( ) ol. 32, No. 4 2008 7 JournalofNanjing Forestry University(NaturalSciencesEdition) Ju.l, 2008 * , (, 210037) : 通过室内模拟试验,研究了保水剂种类及施用浓度对土壤水分蒸发量的影响 果表明, 经过不同类型保 水剂处理后, 各处理土壤的水分蒸发量均随干旱胁迫时间的延长呈先上升后下降的变化趋势, 且经过保水剂处 理的土壤的水分蒸发量始终低于对照; 各保水剂处理中, kh型保水剂处理后土壤的水分蒸发量始终比其他几种 保水剂处理的低在施用浓度上, 保水剂质量分数为 05% 和 03% 两处理对土壤保持水分起较好效果,高浓度 的保水剂反而不利于土壤水分的保持说明施用保水剂能够有效地抑制土壤水分蒸发, 且只有在生产中施用合 适含量的保水剂才能充分发挥其保水效果 : 保水剂; 土壤水分蒸发; 干旱胁迫 : S714. 2; S152 : A : 1000- 2006( 2008)04- 0095- 03 E ffects of waterretain ingagen ts species and con cen tration s on w ater evaporation quan tity of soil * WANG Yu, YE Jianren ( College of ForestR esources and Environment Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China) A b strac t: Based on the smi ulation tests, effects ofwaterretainingagents and its concentrations on moisture evaporation in the soil were studied in lab. The results showed that moisture evaporation treated by different species of water retainingagents increased firstly, and then declined w ith water stress degree tmi e extended. The moisturepreserved capacity of soil, treated bywaterretainingagents, became stronger than thatw ithoutwaterretainingagents. Among all waterretainingagents, the effect of Kehan 98 was the best in reducing the evaporation during thewhole process. Among 4 waterretainingagents, the effect of treatment of 05% and 03% were better than the others. On the contrary, waterretainingagents in high concentration was against moisturepreserved capacity in soi.l The results showed that thewaterretainingagents cou