downloadfilebrain.doc.docVIP

The Brain as a System of Aggregation of Social, Behavioral, and Biological Variables 1.1. Introduction In the sphere of social sciences we study the influence mainly of social variables. Why do we need to aggregate social, behavioral and biological variables? Why do we need to consider biological variables, which we do not influence directly? Because the value of the fitness of the social system is determined by the set of the above-mentioned variables, and because they are dependent on each other. Because we influence biological variables indirectly and produce delayed long-term behavioral changes, the changes of the fitness of the social system become apparent only on the big spatio-temporal scales, outside our horizon of decision-making. Thus we take no notice of them. The problem of the influence of social variables on a common set of behavioral and internal virtual variables of individual first was raised by [Freud 1964] in the beginning of this century. However, he excluded the most important biological variables. Later [Maturana 1980] introduced a notion of autopoiesis and described biological and social objects from a common point of view. They supposed that biological systems were autopoietic systems, and the last ones were homeostatic systems, which have their own organization as the variable that they maintain constant. Their definition was corrected [Degtiar 1999] in such a way that biological systems were systems which strove for having homeostatic organization coordinated with long-term environment. They were successful in reaching the invariable organization relative to classes of variables connected with survival, and they were not fully successful in their endeavor to reach the invariable organization relative to other classes of variables. The biological systems really are autopoietic - allopoietic systems, which in the process of maturation can reach different autopoietic organizations. Those organizations are the function of the mechanism of a