a retrospective study of 1- versus 2-cm excision margins for cutaneous malignant melanomas thicker than 2 mm:回顾性分析1 - 2cm的切缘皮肤恶性黑色素瘤的厚度大于2毫米.pdfVIP

a retrospective study of 1- versus 2-cm excision margins for cutaneous malignant melanomas thicker than 2 mm:回顾性分析1 - 2cm的切缘皮肤恶性黑色素瘤的厚度大于2毫米.pdf

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
a retrospective study of 1- versus 2-cm excision margins for cutaneous malignant melanomas thicker than 2 mm:回顾性分析1 - 2cm的切缘皮肤恶性黑色素瘤的厚度大于2毫米

A retrospective study of 1- versus 2-cm excision margins for cutaneous malignant melanomas thicker than 2 mm Robert E. Hunger, MD, PhD,a Sarina Angermeier, MD,b S. Morteza Seyed Jafari, MD,b Adrian Ochsenbein, MD,c and Maziar Shafighi, MDb Bern, Switzerland Background: Most guidelines recommend at least 2-cm excision margin for melanomas thicker than 2 mm. Objective: We evaluated whether 1- or 2-cm excision margins for melanoma ( [2 mm) result in different outcomes. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study on patients with melanomas ( [2 mm) who underwent tumor excision with 1-cm (228 patients) or 2-cm (97 patients) margins to investigate presence of local recurrences, locoregional and distant metastases, and disease-free and overall survival. Results: In all, 325 patients with mean age of 61.84 years and Breslow thickness of 4.36 mm were considered for the study with a median follow-up of 1852 days (1995-2012). There was no significant difference in the frequency of locoregional and distant metastasis between the 2 groups (P = .311 and .571). The survival analysis showed no differences for disease-free (P = .800; hazard ratio 0.948; 95% confidence interval 0.627-1.433) and overall (P = .951; hazard ratio 1.018; 95% confidence interval 0.575-1.803) survival. Limitations: The study was not prospectively randomized. Conclusions: Our study did not show any significant differences in important outcome parameters such as local or distant metastases and overall survival. A prospective study testing 1- versus 2-cm excision margin is warranted. ( J Am Acad Dermatol 2015;72:1054-9.) Key words: disease-free survival; margin of excision; melanomas

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

ajgoaw + 关注
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档