1例联合接种两种疫苗偶合不明病原体颅内感染的调查.docVIP

1例联合接种两种疫苗偶合不明病原体颅内感染的调查.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
1例联合接种两种疫苗偶合不明病原体颅内感染的调查.doc

1例联合接种两种疫苗偶合不明病原体颅内感染的调查   【摘要】 目的:调查某1例联合接种两种疫苗发生不明病原体颅内感染的病例是否属于预防接种异常反应。方法:对病例开展个案调查,收集资料、汇总分析等,并提出相关诊断结论等。结果:该病例在接种腮腺炎减毒活疫苗、水痘减毒活疫苗1 d后,无明显诱因发病,主要症状有发热、抽搐。先后在市级医院和省级医院住院治疗,主要诊断为重症脑炎、脓毒症、颅内感染和支气管炎;病例血清、脑脊液均未培养,分离出病毒、细菌,相关病毒抗体IgM检测阴性。市级预防接种异常反应调查诊断意见认为,该病例的临床表现与其接种的两种疫苗不存在完整的临床证据链条,现有资料不能证实该病例发生的颅内感染与疫苗有关。结论:病例不属于预防接种异常反应,应判断为偶合症。   【关键词】 疫苗; 病毒; 感染; 腮腺炎; 水痘   中图分类号 R186 文献标识码 B 文章编号 1674-6805(2015)35-0088-04   A Case of a Survey of Joint Two Kinds of Vaccination Coupled with Unknown Pathogen Intracranial Infection/MA Jing-cang,HE Xu-ying.//Chinese and Foreign Medical Research,2015,13(35):88-91   【Abstract】 Objective:To investigate whether a joint two vaccine unknown pathogens intracranial infection belongs to the vaccination abnormal reaction or not.Method:Investigated the case,collected and analyzed the data,and putted forward the diagnostic reports.Result:After 1 day of the case vaccinated with live attenuated mumps vaccination and live attenuated varicella vaccination history later,the case had main symptoms of fever,convulsions with no obvious inducement.The case had treatment successively in a municipal hospital and a provincial hospital,and the main diagnosis were severe encephalitis,sepsis,intracranial infection and bronchitis;No virus or bacteria was cultivated,viruses,bacteria were isolated;No related positive IgM antibody of virus was detected.The opinions of municipal Immunization Survey diagnosis expert group for the diagnosis were that there were no chain evidences between the clinical manifestation and the two kinds of vaccination,and the clinical data available could not support the relevance between the occurrence of intracranial infection and the Vaccination.Conclusion:The case was not an AEFI case,which could be judged as a coupling case.   【Key words】 Vaccine; Virus; Infection; Mumps; Varicella   First-author’s address:Heze Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Heze 274010,China   doi:10.14033/j.cnki.cfmr.2015.35.042   随着我国经济和社

文档评论(0)

lmother_lt + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档