How does the Output Hypothesis Impact on Second Language Acquisition.doc

How does the Output Hypothesis Impact on Second Language Acquisition.doc

  1. 1、本文档共9页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
How does the Output Hypothesis Impact on Second Language Acquisition.doc

How does the Output Hypothesis Impact on Second Language Acquisition   Abstract This paper aims to investigate the importance of output in English as Second/ Foreign Language Learning (ESL/EFL) firstly by demonstrating three functions of output. Finally, teaching implications are drawn concerning the role of output in ESL/EFL, in order to encourage optimal language development and facilitate their achievement of language proficiency.   Key words output, output hypothesis, SLA   中图分类号:H319 文献标识码:A   1 Overview of output in SLA   The output hypothesis was first put forward by Swain (1985) in connection with SLA based on the French immersion program she had conducted s in Canada. In contrast to Krashen, Swain identifies that too little language production precludes the learners from attaining second or foreign language of high level. In the research, he also states that comprehensible output does not take the responsibility for all language competence. Rather, he claims that under some circumstances, output sometimes enhances second language learning in ways that are different from those of input (Swain and Lapkin, 1995). The notion “Output”, used to indicate the outcome or product of the language acquisition device (krashen, 1985), is now more likely regarded as a verb interpreting the action or process of learning second language under certain situation , such as “producing language”, “using a language” and “speaking or writing” (Swain, 1995, P125-127). Izumi(2002) promotes the psycholinguistic rationale of this hypotheses. In 2002, Mackey provides evidence of the reality of the notion of “pushed output”. In addition, VanPatten (2003) describes “output” as the process of second or foreign language learning that the learners produce in order to communicate or express meaning. Therefore, the comprehensible output hypothesis not only functions as the practice of producing language to increase efficient output, but also promotes the advancement of the interlangu

文档评论(0)

jingpinwedang + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档