Design Constraints CAE Users设计约束CAE用户.pptVIP

Device to Improve Yield of Fine Needle Aspiration TEAM MEMBERS: Kristen Seashore Tu Hoang Anh Mai Chris Goplen Jason Tham Outline Background (Fine Needle Aspiration) Problem Statement Current Devices Competition Alternate Designs Design Matrix Future Work Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) Biopsy to remove tissue cells for testing Fine needle procedure (21 to 25 gauge) Performed on the following tissue types: Neck lymph nodes Neck cysts Thyroid gland Breast tissue Any lump that can be felt 70-80% success rate Categories of results: Benign Malignant Non-definitive FNA Procedure Small needle inserted into suspected mass Needle moved in and out of tissue Pressure difference draws cells into needle Sample examined for abnormal cells Sample of about 100 cells average Problem Statement Improve current FNA procedure Single procedure Reduce operating time and cost Maximize tissue sample size Minimize patient discomfort Create automated device Precise needle oscillation Suction cell removal Testing Phantom tissues Human testing Current Devices Manual aspiration biopsy technique Handheld needle with syringe for suction Manually inserted needle Multiple attempts to collect sample Competition Cameco Syringe Gun Applies constant suction with specimen filter Difficult to use and more expensive Vacuum Needle Partial withdrawal creates suction Patented FNA Gun Vibratory needle motion No testing or marketing No device had advantage over manual method Design Constraints Design 1: Manual Mechanical Plunger manually drives needle shaft Linear spring causes plunger recoil and suction Hexagonal plunger rotation adjusts needle depth Design 1: Pros and Cons Pros Simple design All motion is linear Easy depth adjustment Small size Cons Manual Not ergonomic Design 2: Solenoid Two AC solenoids with DC solenoid in between DC solenoid movement drives shaft Electrical cord powers AC solenoids Rechargeable battery powers DC solenoid AC solenoid distance adjusts needle depth Design 2: Pros and Cons Pros