Development of a SelfAssessment Method for Patients to一种自我评价方法的发展.pptVIP

下载本文档

1
0
约1.82万字
约 28页
2017-02-10 发布于上海
举报
版权申诉

Development of a SelfAssessment Method for Patients to一种自我评价方法的发展.ppt

1、本文档共28页，可阅读全部内容。
2、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。
3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
5、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
6、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
7、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

Development of a Self-Assessment Method for Patients to Evaluate Internet-based Health Information Purpose of the study Development of a Self-Assessment Method for patients to evaluate quality and relevance of health care oriented websites Validation of the Stability and Consistency the Self-Assessment Method for website evaluation the use of the tool the conceptualization Background and Significance The Internet hosts a large number of accurate health-oriented websites with endless opportunities to inform, teach and connect patients. Health care consumers need a way to judge the quality and relevance of the information provided on the Internet. Background and Significance Quality as perceived by the “general” users relates not only to accuracy of content but rather to presentation, perceived trust, clear credentials, and other markers that tend to give information weight. Patients will accept or use a WWW page when the information is perceived as relevant to his/her situation. Development of a Self-Assessment Method for Evaluation of Websites Study Design Summary of criteria/guidelines for evaluating WebPages, published in journal articles and on-line publications Categorization of the criteria through lexical and contextual analysis Study Design Comparison to the criteria to what the “general” user of the WWW perceives as quality and/or relevance. Conceptualization of four criteria considered as indicative of quality and relevance as perceived by the “general” user of information on the Internet. “Quality and Relevance” Criteria Validation of the Stability and Consistency the Self-Assessment Method for Website Evaluation Sample 16 students from a small Midwestern university participated in the testing of the method Female, Caucasian Average age: 22 year Medical/clinical knowledge: none to basic Internet skills varying from none to good Procedure Participants were asked to list 3 topics related to health and to search the web for information o