Mixing Control of Fuel Jets Using Synthetic Jet Technology采用合成射流技术的燃油喷射混合控制.pptVIP

Mixing in Coaxial Jets Using Synthetic Jet Actuators Brian Ritchie Dilip R. Mujumdar Jerry Seitzman Supported by ARO-MURI Overview Goal Control of (scalar) mixing rate Fuel-air mixing Requirements Large-scales, stirring/entrainment Small-scales, leads to molecular mixing Approach Synthetic jets Synthetic Jets Amplitude and frequency control High frequency, small scales Low frequency amplitude modulation, large scales Need no external fluid Mixture Fraction Measurements Measurement technique: acetone PLIF Acetone PLIF data corrected for laser sheet energy distribution laser energy absorption acetone seeding variation with time shot-to-shot laser energy Mixture fraction ( f = mannulus fluid/mtotal ) f = 1 at annulus exit Facility Previous Results - Single Jet Single Jet Mixing Facility Comparison Mixture Fraction Images PDF Images PDF: x/Do = 0.25 PDF: x/Do = 1.5 PDF: x/Do = 2.5 Amplitude Modulation (Pulsing) Comparison to Velocity PDF: Pulsing Profiles: x/Do = 0.25 Profiles: x/Do = 2 Integrated Data Integrated Acetone Integrated Pure Acetone Conclusions Velocity and mixing data acquired for similar conditions Direct small-scale and large-scale excitation Control by Changing amplitude Turning modulation on/off Spatial distribution of actuators (causes asymmetry seen in current data) Conclusions (cont.) Near-field mixing enhancement Initially on outer mixing layer Inner mixing layer more enhanced downstream Large-scale structures survive Enhanced entrainment outweighs duty cycle loss for coaxial jets (unlike single jet case) Most effective on outer mixing layer Other velocity ratios 0.3 case similar to 0.62; 1.4 case less response Georgia Tech 38th Aerospace Sciences Meeting camera x Acetone-seeded air r 3” UV laser sheet Secondary laser sheet Small acetone jet Metalpost Di = 1.59 cm Do = 2.54 cm air jet fluid 0 on 9 on Pulsing (modulated) 2.54 cm Less mixing in pulsing case, lower duty cycle Ui/Uo = 0.3 0.62 1.4 m