社会语言学 语用学.ppt

  1. 1、本文档共39页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
社会语言学 语用学

Linguistic Pragmatics: Conversational Implicature;Content;Is this your pen?; Background of Pragmatics;The term “pragmatics” may be used in three senses: First, it may refer to a discipline. (Pragmatics is a newly arising discipline.) Secondly, the term may refer to itself. Thirdly, “pragmatics” may refer to the phenomenon of language use, or that of the regularity in language use.;Although pragmatics is a relatively new branch of linguistics, research on it can be dated back to ancient Greece and Rome where the term “pragmaticus” is found in late Latin and “pragmaticos” in Greek, both mean being practical.;The term “pragmatics” was first introduced into the literature by the American philosopher Charles William Morris in 1937 in his Logical Positivism, Pragmatism and Scientific Empirism.;Syntax: the four sentences are results of different transformation from the same underlying structure.;句法学家会指出这是一个无主语的祈使句,由一个动词加一个代词组成。;Structural Linguistics ;in China: Hu Zhuanglin published Pragmatics in Linguistics Abroad in 1980.;Jacob L. Mey. Pragmatics: An Introduction. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2001; Semantics was an abstract science whose main concern was the conditions under which a sentence could be true or false.;Where negation, connectives, quantifiers, and conditionals are involved, we need rules of inference in order to determine true conditions.;It might seem that if we had such a complete and accurate lexicon that we knew exactly what everything is called, and we had the right rules of inference, it would be possible to establish the truth of anything which might be expressed in the language that lexicon goes with, without regarding to who uttered the expression to whom under what conditions, or semantics could be established completely and independently of pragmatics. For better or worse, though, there are myriad problems with this idea.;Semantics was unable to explain certain phenomena that transcended those conditions. For instan

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

shuwkb + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档