Who is helping Nike attack China-.docVIP

 PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 41 Who is helping Nike attack China? One case led to the cross-border intellectual property rights in China would be amp;quot;over-protectionamp;quot; strongly questioned. Case to China to accept a large number of foreign orders by engaging in OEM business enterprises adverse impact will be immeasurable Shenzhen Case endless troubles Nearly two years, and Zhang Yong-Qiang a case is still angry about that incessantly. In December 2002 concluded, amp;quot;Nike ski jacket trademark infringement caseamp;quot;, his garment factory in Jiaxing, Zhejiang Yinxing by the Shenzhen Intermediate People’s Court ruling infringed Nike’s trademark rights. He always did not understand the logic of this decision. Although only a junior high school culture, intellectual property rights not to mention common sense, but only from the point of view, in the end he did not admit that he violated the rights of who is what. This ruling made since the end of 2002, but appears in the September 2004 issue of the ‘reading’ magazines. This group of intellectuals in China enjoys great prestige in the magazine held a meeting on China’s IPR protection seminar, attended by several prominent scholars quoted in December 2002 the Shenzhen Intermediate People’s Court of China, amp;quot;Nike ski jacket trademark infringement case , amp;quot;that it is China’s intellectual property rights of transnational corporations classic case of overprotection. The so-called over-protection, layman’s terms, that is, do not or should not be protected when the concession in regard to the protection. The over-protection of transnational corporations, it means that harm the interests of Chinese enterprises. ‘Reading’ on the scholars warned that the ruling in Shenzhen since it may form a dangerous precedent will be large areas of Chinese enterprises and thus China’s future economic growth at risk. Zhang Qiang and his garment factory that is affected by the injury. In fact, in this cross-borde