半柔性路面灌浆材料的配方及性能比较(英文).pdf

Construction and Building Materials 115 (2016) 582–592 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Construction and Building Materials journal homepage: www. /loc ate/conbuildmat Formulation and performance comparison of grouting materials for semi-flexible pavement Jiupeng Zhang a, Jun Cai a, Jianzhong Pei a,⇑, Rui Li a, Xiangfeng Chen b a School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710064, China b Tianchi Highway Technology Development Co. LTD., Nanchang, Jiangxi 330103, China h i g h l i g h t s Cement paste and mortar are compared as the grouting materials for SFP. Effects of compositions on fluidity, strength and drying shrinkage are analyzed. Optimal formulations are respectively determined for cement paste and mortar. Properties of paste and mortar meet the requirements with optimal formulations. Cement paste with optimal formulation is more suitable as a grouting material. a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Semi-flexible pavement has been widely used for good performance, however, few studies have been Received 20 January 2016 made on effects of composition and formulation on grouting material. Therefore, this paper focuses on Received in revised form 14 April 2016 effects of composition and formulation on two typical grouting materials, including cement paste and Accepted 18 April 2016 cement mortar. The optimal formulations of these two materials are determined, and their performances Available online 28 April 2016 are compared in terms of fluid