无领导小组讨论面试评分标准详解策略（国外英文资料）.docVIP

无领导小组讨论面试评分标准详解策略（国外英文资料） No leadership team discusses the strategy of the interview scoring criteria Source: the journal of zhao lulu KAB In general, in the absence of a leadership group discussion, the evaluation criteria are based on the number of effective statements of the participants. Is it good at presenting new insights and solutions? Dare to make a different opinion, support or affirm the opinions of others, and make your own opinions based on the opinions of others. Whether is good at to eliminate tension, convince others, mediation of disputes, to create a make the atmosphere of the little people also want to speak, to agree to all; See if you can listen to others, respect others, and whether they will infringe on others. The ability of language expression, the ability to analyze, summarize and summarize the different opinions, the initiative of the speech, the sensitivity of the response, etc. Specifically, there are three aspects. 1. The language Including speech initiative, organization and coordination ability, oral expression ability, ability to persuade, the correctness of the contention of the debate, these different elements should be based on different positions have different weighted score. In the course of concrete implementation, the factors and the weight of each factor can be determined according to the specific situation, so as to correspond to the specific position and position. No leadership team discusses one of the evaluation tables: language Initiative of assessment factors to speak Organization and coordination ability Oral communication ability Ability to persuade the correctness of the contention total score note debates Name five 5 8 12 10 40 Non-verbal aspects include facial expressions, body posture, tone of voice, speed of speech, and gestures. No leadership team to discuss the table two: Assessment elements facial expressions Total score note body posture intonation speed gestures 5 3 5 2 203. Individual character characteris