肝素联合山莨菪碱对脓毒性休克乳酸酸中毒治疗探索.doc

肝素联合山莨菪碱对脓毒性休克乳酸酸中毒治疗探索.doc

  1. 1、本文档共6页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
肝素联合山莨菪碱对脓毒性休克乳酸酸中毒治疗探索

肝素联合山莨菪碱对脓毒性休克乳酸酸中毒治疗探索   [摘要] 目的 探索肝素联合山莨菪碱对脓毒性休克乳酸酸中毒的治疗作用。方法 方便收集2015年5月―2016年5月福建省立金山医院收治的符合条件的脓毒性休克致乳酸酸中毒患者42例,随机分成A、B两组,A组与常规集束化治疗,B组在常规集束化治疗基础上加用肝素及山莨菪碱。比较两组患者的6、12 h乳酸清除率,每小时尿量,入院24 h APACHEⅡ评分。结果 A组患者6、12 h乳酸清除率[(0.25±0.10)、(0.57±0.16)]明显低于B组[(0.33±0.13)、(0.67±0.10)](t=2.174, 2.536, P=0.036, 0.015);24 h APACHEⅡ评分[(11.41±3.30)分]小于A组(13.57±3.59)分](t=2.058, P=0.046);尿量(1.04±0.54)较A组(0.59±0.28)明显增加(t=3.426, P=0.001)。结论 肝素联合山莨菪碱可提高脓毒性休克乳酸酸中毒患者的6、12 h乳酸清除率,改善尿量,改善病情。这可能和山莨菪碱、肝素联合使用具有改善微循环、抗凝、抗炎等作用有关 [关键词] 肝素;山莨菪碱;脓毒性休克;乳酸酸中毒;APACHEⅡ评分 [中图分类号] R720.597 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2017)01(c)-0038-04 Treatment Exploration of Heparin and Anisodamine on the Septic Shock Lactic Acidosis LIN Xing-sheng1,2, SHI Song-chang1, SHI Song-jing2 1.Department of First ICU, Fujian Provincial Jinshan Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, 350028 China;2.Department of Second ICU, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, 350001 China [Abstract] Objective To explore the treatment effect of heparin and anisodamine on the septic shock lactic acidosis. Methods Convenient selection 42 cases of patients with septic shock lactic acidosis admitted and treated in our hospital from May 2015 to May 2016 were collected and randomly divided into two groups, the group A adopted the routine cluster treatment, while the group B adopted the heparin and anisodamine on the basis of the group A, and the 6h and 12h lactic clearance rates, urine output per hour and APACHEⅡ score at 24 h after admission of the two groups were compared. Results The 6 h and 12 h lactic clearance rates in the group B were obviously higher than those in the group A[(0.25±0.10), (0.57±0.16), (0.33±0.13), (0.67±0.10)](t=2.174, 2.536, P=0.036, 0.015), the 24 h APACHEⅡ score was lower than that in the group A[(11.41±3.30)points vs (13.57±3.59)points] (t=2.058, P=0.046), and the urine output obviously increased compared with that in the group A, [(1.04±0.54) vs (0.59±0.28)](t=3.426, P=0.001). Conclusion Hep

文档评论(0)

docman126 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档