In the reflection into the new curriculum-毕业论文翻译.docVIP

In the reflection into the new curriculum Some people likened teachers to “actors”, some people likened teachers to “director”, but also some people likened teachers to “screenwriter.” When people realize that performing a single role, can not represent the image of teachers, so some people say: Teachers = “actor” “director”, “screenwriter.” At first glance, these metaphors is quite artistic, it does make sense. A little analysis will reveal that these metaphors not only incompatible with the new curriculum ideas, teaching activities and does not conform to the objective laws of human development. Teachers are “screenwriter” do The teacher said figuratively, as the scriptwriter, mainly refers to the teachers should be teaching. Some people even instructional design and script writing of the story made a comparison: To review the Import (prelude) - teach amp; Products (plot development) - class discussion (story height) - summed up (outcome). At first glance, instructional design, and art writers have some things in common. Indeed, teaching is an art. However, the teaching of art and art writer is not mentioned in the same language. Writer’s purpose is to achieve the effect of the pursuit of drama, in order to plot the effect, regulate a variety of roles in the story in the behavior. The teacher’s role is to seek students to develop their teaching effectiveness, to the development of students, you can change the original design of the classroom, so that changes in teaching links, and even unexpected changes. One teacher taught Lu Xun’s novel “blessing”, the original design of “The Death of Xianglinsao who is the murderer” as a theme to enable students to answer: Lu 4 master is not a murderer, Sishen is not a murderer, Liu Ma is not a murderer ... ... came to the conclusion, “the feudal ethical code is the real killer,” conclusion. However, the first student to stand up say “Xianglinsao is a suicide, there is no killer issue.” In accordance wi