Interpretation of language practice-毕业论文翻译.docVIP

Interpretation of language practice Abstract: The new curriculum focused on practical ability of language students, and advocates the main way to develop this ability should also be the language of practice. However, this has caused all sorts of misreading, leading to the current language teaching, there was greater deviation. There are three types of language practice: practical ability and language have the same form of listening, speaking, reading and writing practice, with the natural learning nature; right by the ability to cultivate the language has a direct catalytic role, the latent content of a particular language teaching practices; language knowledge sense of language into the language practice. As in the modern sense of the language courses, but also should be emphasized that after two types of “language of practice.” Keywords: Language practical ability; language practice; ways of cultivating “Language is a highly practical course, students should focus on practical language ability, but the main way to develop this ability should also be a language practice, and not deliberately seeking language knowledge and integrity of the system.” This is a “full-time duty Education Language Curriculum Standards (trial version), “one of the basic idea, and” ordinary standards of high school language curriculum (experimental) “as” continue to adhere to. “ Interpretation of this concept, the correct understanding of the language curriculum standards as well as a scientific implement them is essential. This is the main thrust of which “the main way to develop this capability should also be a language of practice,” the interpretation of this discussion, please Fong corrected. 1, the problem of the border Horizons are very broad language learning. We carried out the students in daily life, language learning, language learning generally referred to as “social access.” Other courses in the school, students in fact are engaged in rich language activit