Linux与Windows的安全性比较（国外英文资料）.docVIP

Linux与Windows的安全性比较 Comparison of security between Linux and Windows Security issues are a long-term concern for IT administrators. Executives need a framework to the security of the operating system and reasonable evaluation, including: basic security, network security and protocol, application protocol, release and operation, reliability, trusted computing, open standards. In this article, we will compare the security of Microsoft, Windows, and Linux in accordance with these seven categories. The final qualitative conclusion is that so far, Linux offers better security performance relative to Windows, with only one exception (certainty). No matter what standards are used to evaluate Windows and Linux, there are problems: each operating system has more than one version. Microsofts operating system, Windows98, Windows NT, Windows 2000, Windows 2003 Server and Windows CE, and Linux release (due to kernel based on the 2.2 and 2.4, 2.6) and different different software packages also have great differences. The operating systems we use in this article are current technologies, not those of old solutions. Users need to remember that there is a philosophical difference between Linux and Windows in terms of design. The Windows operating system tends to integrate more functions into the operating system and combine the program with the kernel; and unlike the Windows, Linux has distinct boundaries between the kernel space and the user space. Depending on the design architecture, both can make the operating system more secure. Basic changes in Linux and Windows security For users, the constant updating of Linux and Windows has led to competition between the two. Users can have their own favorite system, but also pay attention to the development of competition. Microsofts initiative seems to be higher - this is due to the industrys cynical incentive and the continuous development of Linux. Microsoft will be in the next few months to improve the security of Windows, when Micros