液压破裂法Fracking介绍.pptx

  1. 1、本文档共23页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
液压破裂法Fracking介绍

Natural gas and fracking;Natural Gas;;Formation;Shale Rock;What is Fracking?;Extraction;Problems;Use/Contamination of Water;Contamination of Water;Deregulation;“States provide an exemption to the disclosure requirements for information deemed to be a proprietary ‘trade secret.’ A trade secret is a formula or other information about a product that gives a company a competitive advantage in the marketplace, such as the secret formula for Coca-Cola. When a law requires disclosure of chemicals, companies may desire to keep what they consider to be trade secrets confidential. Regulators must have in place a legitimate and transparent process to determine what information genuinely deserves trade secret protection.”;“To ensure that trade secret claims are legitimate, companies should be made to provide specific factual justification which demonstrates that they are entitled to prevent public disclosure of the information. There should be a clear process for evaluating each claim and the public should be able to challenge exemptions that are granted. In addition, it should be made clear that trade secret status for the formula of a product (i.e. the amount of each chemical that goes into the product) is not equivalent to trade secret status for the identity of the chemicals that constitute it. Companies should have to provide separate factual justification for each claim.”;Assessing Health Impacts;Cases of Animal Deaths;Exemption Laws;Are there benefits?;Benefits to Natural Gas;Vocabulary;Sources

文档评论(0)

dajuhyy + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档