十大经典贸易案例（Ten classic case of trade）.docVIP

十大经典贸易案例（Ten classic case of trade） Rule of use: analysis of ten classic trade cases Chinas accession to the WTO, our first reaction is often when the import car price? Will imports be cheaper? Theres nothing wrong with that. But we often ignore the fact that China in globalization should not only play the role of consumer, but also be a competitive producer. Therefore, for Chinese enterprises, it is important to face reality and maximize the use of rules for their own interests. Joining the WTO and interpreting past trade disputes may help us. 1, Kodak attacks Fuji In case The story takes place under an extreme background - the Uruguay round. Japans import tariffs on color and black and white films have dropped to zero, i.e., foreign products, such as the Kodak, have no barriers to entry into the Japanese market. Fuji and Kodak are two masters in the world of film industry, and in the Japanese market, Kodak is always looking for opportunities to beat its rivals. Kodak is hard to pick on Japan in terms of market access. So, how do you use the WTO rule to find a breakthrough point to defeat your opponent? Kodak uses GATT twenty-third, 1. The United States has said that Japan has not violated a particular terms of obligation of WTO, and that Japan has achieved its commitment to tariff reductions in the previous rounds. However, the Japanese government measures on film sales, but the United States because of tariffs in Japan made in the Kennedy round, the Tokyo round and Uruguay round of concessions and benefits are loss or impairment of a violation of the 1 paragraph of article twenty-third of the GATT. Specifically, the United States accused Japan of limited circulation measures to encourage and promote the Japanese film market sales system from big stores to sell multiple brands of single brand sales monopoly, thus restricting the imported film sales ability, prevent Kodaks ability to open up the market. - Award The United States lost the case. WTO Expert Group beli