关节镜下心螺钉与缝线内固定治疗胫骨髁间棘骨折.doc

关节镜下心螺钉与缝线内固定治疗胫骨髁间棘骨折.doc

  1. 1、本文档共6页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
关节镜下心螺钉与缝线内固定治疗胫骨髁间棘骨折

关节镜下空心螺钉与缝线内固定治疗胫骨髁间棘骨折 陈维东(盐城市第三人民医院骨科,江苏省盐城市 224001) 文章亮点: 比较关节镜下应用空心螺钉(n=25)与缝线(n=21)内固定治疗胫骨髁间棘骨折的效果,得出空心螺钉治疗胫骨髁间棘骨折比缝线有利于胫骨髁间棘骨折恢复的结论,提供临床同仁借鉴。 关键词: 骨关节植入物;骨科植入物;关节镜;胫骨髁间棘骨折;空心螺钉;缝线;内固定;Lysholm评分;疗效 主题词: 骨折;关节镜;内固定器;缝线;骨钉 摘要 背景:胫骨髁间棘骨折临床目前多用关节镜下手术治疗,但其固定方法目前尚有争议。 目的:比较关节镜下应用空心螺钉与缝线内固定治疗胫骨髁间棘骨折的临床疗效。 方法:收集盐城市第三人民医院自2010年6月至2013年1月收治的46例胫骨髁间棘骨折患者,根据患者意愿及医师建议分为空心螺钉组(n=25)和缝线组(n=21),分别在关节镜下行空心螺钉与缝线内固定。 结果与结论:空心螺钉组与缝线组胫骨髁间棘骨折患者固定后Ikeuchi膝关节评分优良率差异无显著性意义 (P 0.05),但空心螺钉组患者固定后功能训练时间明显比缝线组短(P 0.05)。提示关节镜下空心螺钉治疗胫骨髁间棘骨折比缝线有利于胫骨髁间棘骨折患者的恢复。 Hollow screw and suture fixation for treatment of tibial intercondylar eminence fractures under arthroscopy Chen Wei-dong (Department of Orthopedics, the Third People’s Hospital of Yancheng, Yancheng 224001, Jiangsu Province, China) Abstract BACKGROUND: Intercondylar eminence fractures of the tibia are often treated by arthroscopic surgery, but the fixation methods are controversial. OBJECTIVE: To compare curative effect of hollow screw and suture fixation in treatment of tibial intercondylar eminence fractures under arthroscopy. METHODS: A total of 46 patients with tibial intercondylar eminence fractures were recruited from the Third People’s Hospital of Yancheng, China from June 2010 to January 2013. According to the patient’s willing and physician’s suggestions, the involved patients were divided into hollow screw group (n=25) and suture fixation group (n=21), undergoing hollow screw and suture fixation under arthroscopy, respectively. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: According to Ikeuchi grade, the excellent and good rate after fixation showed no significant differences between the two groups (P 0.05), but the functional training time in hollow screw group was significantly shorter than that in suture fixation group (P 0.05). Hollow screw treatment under the arthroscopy is better than suture fixation in treatment of intercondylar eminence fractures of the tibia. Subject headings: fracture; arthroscopy; internal fixator; suture; bo

文档评论(0)

jiaoyuguanliji + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档