论秦始皇的法治主义教育学论文（On the education thesis of rule of law by the first emperor of Qin Dynasty）.docVIP

论秦始皇的法治主义教育学论文（On the education thesis of rule of law by the first emperor of Qin Dynasty） One If we want to figure out this problem, it is necessary for us to start with the origin of Chinese law, otherwise it is very difficult to correctly understand Qin Shihuangs specific connotation of rule of law. When it comes to the origin of the law, different nationalities have different circumstances. As far as the Chinese legal system is concerned, it is a special product of Chinese ethical culture. Therefore, the concept and content of our law do not mark the mark of this culture anywhere. Before the Warring States period, the Chinese society had no concept of law. Traced back to the primitive society, specifically in the Five Emperors era, to regulate peoples social behavior is de. Books on said: the Dehua [2] ; and, just carry on filial piety [3], which is referred to. After the end of the primitive society, the original ecological state of Xia, Shang and Zhou dynasties, ceremony instead of Virtue, and gradually formed the important principle of governing. Why does rite replace the morality at this time to regulate the social behavior of the members of the society? The ancients once said such a thing, it is called adult life and thought ceremony. [4]. From the news revealed by this sentence, it undoubtedly implies that ceremony originated from the emergence of the state, in order to ensure the hereditary system of private power. We feel that this interpretation is very consistent with the historical situation. Since then, in a fairly long historical period (particularly from the Xia Dynasty to the spring and Autumn period), ceremony as a special tool for social members behavior appears after the country, seems to play the role of law. But we say, ceremony and law are essentially different, and the ancients are very clear. The ancients explained this: the rites are forbidden before the law, and the law is forbidden.. On the surface of [5], although the two are the norms