四级深度阅读试题精选(5套10篇).doc

深度阅读试题精选——五套 共十篇 第一套 Section B Directions: There are 2 passages in this section. Each passage is followed by some questions or unfinished statements. For each of them there are four choices marked A) , B) , C) , and D) .You should decide on the best choice and mark the corresponding letter on Answer Sheet 2 with a single line through the centre. Passage One Questions 57 to 61 are based on the following passage. 选材题源 New Scientist 《新科学家》 选材仿真度 ★★★★ 仿真设题 57题仿照2008年6月第57题设题；58题仿照2010年12月第58题设题； 59题仿照2006年6月第59题设题；60题仿照2009年6月第61题设题； 61题仿照2008年6月第66题设题。 Do you believe that some principles are sacred? If you do, it could make you a hawk rather than a dove in time of war. A new study suggests that most societies have “sacred rules” for which their people would die rather than compromise. If people perceive one such rule to have been violated, they may feel morally obliged to retaliate(报复) against the wrongdoers—even if the retaliation does more harm than good. Psychologist Jeremy Ginges and anthropologist Scott Atran presented 50 US students with a hypothetical crisis in which a foreign country captured 100 US citizens and was expected to kill them. Half the volunteers were asked to consider a military response to the kidnapping, and half a diplomatic response. When told that their action would result in all hostages(人质) being saved, both groups approved the plan presented to them. Told that one hostage would die, however, most “diplomats” became reluctant to approve the proposed response.“Militarists” had no such doubts. In fact, the most common response suggested that they would support military action even if 99 hostages died as a consequence. Similar results were found in studies of Nigerian and Palestinian volunteers.揚eople are much more willing to accept grievous losses during violence than in diplomacy,?Atran says.揑t doesn’t make any sense.?Atran has a theory to explain the unusual results. The diplomats considered the costs and benefits of their decision