- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Behavioural knowledge integration in the design studio an experimental evaluatio推荐
Behavioural knowledge integration in
the design studio: an experimental
evaluation of three strategies
Fahriye Hazer Sancar, College of Architecture and Planning,
Environmental Design Building, Campus Box 314, University of
Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0314, USA
This study addresses the difficulties in design education regarding scientific
knowledge generation and its application in the design studio by
investigating the effects ofparticular design approaches on the integration
of sociobehavioural scientific information by design students. The
investigation in volved the systematic assignment of the students to one of
three treatments representing alternative design approaches and assessment
of the effects of these treatments on the quality of their design products in
terms of knowledge integration. The three treatments approximate the
major methodological approaches that are debated in the literature. They
differ in their assumptions on the nature of the design process, theform of
knowledge, and the type of information representation. The results support
the main hypothesis that a treatment corresponding to the integrative/
generative strategy, in which style (aform image, combinatorial rules and
a theoretical framework) serves as aprimary generator, is superior to a
listing of empirical information generated by an external source. Given the
discussion in the literature on the design process and cognition and the
results of this study, it ispossible to state that the applicability gap is
expected to diminish to the extent that theform of knowledge embodied in
style is explicitly linked to the development of scientific knowledge.
Keywords: design education, knowledge integration, design style, design
evaluation
s stated in
您可能关注的文档
- Analysis of genetic variability in Aristaeomorpha foliacea (Crustacea,推荐.pdf
- Analysis of genetic diversity in Acorus calamus populations in South推荐.pdf
- Analysis of genetic variation in grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus)推荐.pdf
- Analysis of the genetic structure of Rhodiola rosea (Crassulaceae) usingn推荐.pdf
- Analysis of Financial Statements推荐.pdf
- Analyzing Performance and Competitive Position推荐.pdf
- and now a word from our sponsor推荐.pdf
- Andrey Davydenko, Robert Fildes推荐.pdf
- ANNUAL PLANT REVIEWS Gene targeting推荐.pdf
- ANNUAL PLANT REVIEWS Comparative Genomics推荐.pdf
- Belief Revision and Update Complexity of Model Checking推荐.pdf
- Behavrioral Economics推荐.pdf
- Best neighbor strategy to enforce cooperation among selfish nodes in wireless ad hoc network推荐.pdf
- Best Practices for Optimizing HDX Technologies for XenDesktop 4推荐.pdf
- Better LATE Than Nothing推荐.pdf
- Beyond Basic Numerics and Statistics推荐.pdf
- BGI - K2 Studio and InfoPath HandsOn - Travel Request Process推荐.pdf
- BIM在给水排水工程设计中的应用推荐.docx
- Binomial algorithms for the evaluation of options on stocks with fixed per share dividends推荐.pdf
- Binomial Option Pricing Basic Concepts推荐.pdf
原创力文档


文档评论(0)