PredictingMechanicalReasoningAbility(ReasoningwiththeNavy)预测机械推理能力（与海军的推理）.pptVIP

下载本文档

5
0
约1.57万字
约 67页
2018-06-29 发布于浙江
举报
版权申诉

PredictingMechanicalReasoningAbility(ReasoningwiththeNavy)预测机械推理能力（与海军的推理）.ppt

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

PredictingMechanicalReasoningAbility(ReasoningwiththeNavy)预测机械推理能力（与海军的推理）

AutoTutor: An Intelligent Tutoring System with Mixed Initiative Dialog Art Graesser University of Memphis Department of Psychology the Institute for Intelligent Systems Supported on grants from the NSF, ONR, ARI, IDA, IES, US Census Bureau, and CHI Systems Overview Brief comments on my research on question asking and answering Primary focus is on AutoTutor -- a collaborative reasoning and question answering system Overview of my Research on Questions Psychological Models Question asking (PREG, ONR, NSF, ARI) Question answering (QUEST, ONR) Computer Artifacts Tutor (AutoTutor, Why/AutoTutor, Think like a commander, NSF, ONR, ARI, CHI Systems) Survey question critiquer (QUAID, US Census, NSF) Point Query software (PQ, ONR) Query-based information retrieval (HURA Advisor, IDA) AutoTutor Collaborative reasoning and question answering in tutorial dialog Think Like a Commander Vignettes 1 Trouble in McLouth 2 Save the Shrine 3 The Recon Fight 4 A Shift In Forces 5 The Attack Begins 6 The Bigger Picture 7 Looking Deep 8 Before the Attack 9 Meanwhile Back at the Ranch What does AutoTutor do? Asks questions and presents problems Why? How? What-if? What is the difference? Evaluates meaning and correctness of the learner’s answers (LSA and computational linguistics) Gives feedback on answers Face displays emotions + some gestures Hints Prompts for specific information Adds information that is missed Corrects some bugs and misconceptions Answers student question Holds mixed-initiative dialog in natural language Pedagogical Design Goals Simulate normal human tutors and ideal tutors Active construction of student knowledge rather than information delivery system Collaborative answering of deep reasoning questions Approximate evaluation of student knowledge rather than detailed student modeling A discourse prosthesis Feasibility of Natural Language Dialog in Tutoring Learners are forgiving when the tutor’s dialog acts are imperfect. They are even more for