重型颅脑外伤去骨瓣减压术护理点分析.docVIP

重型颅脑外伤去骨瓣减压术护理点分析.doc

此“医疗卫生”领域文档为创作者个人分享资料,不作为权威性指导和指引,仅供参考
  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
重型颅脑外伤去骨瓣减压术护理点分析

重型颅脑外伤去骨瓣减压术护理要点分析   [摘要] 目的 研究探讨重型颅脑外伤去骨瓣减压术护理要点,为今后临床护理工作提供指导参考。 方法 方便选取并回顾分析该院2013年8月―2015年11月期间收治行去骨瓣减压术治疗的71例重型颅脑损伤患者临床资料,根据患者采用的护理措施的差异性分为两组,对照组35例,行常规护理方式进行护理服务,观察组36例,在去骨瓣减压围手术期实行预见性综合护理模式服务;通过对比观察两组患者预后疗效GCS评分改善情况及相关重症并发症情况。 结果 观察组患者护理治疗后格拉斯哥GCS提升为(9.6±0.8)分,明显高于对照组(8.2±0.7)分,差异有统计学意义(t=7.8387,P=0.0000);观察组患者并发症率明显低于对照组(χ2=12.2465,P=0.0004)差异有统计学意义。结论 在重型颅脑外伤患者行去骨瓣减压术治疗围手术期实施预见性综合护理模式,通过细心、周到的护理,提升患者术后治疗效果,减少围手术期危险,确保患者在医疗就诊安全性。 中国论文网 /6/viewhtm  [关键词] 重型颅脑外伤;去骨瓣减压术;护理   [中图分类号] R473.6 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2016)05(a)-0157-03   [Abstract] Objective To research and study the nursing points of decompressive craniectomy for severe craniocerebral injury and provide guidance and reference for the future clinical nursing work. Methods The clinical data of 71 cases of patients with severe craniocerebral injury treated with decompressive craniectomy in our hospital from August 2013 to November 2015 were retrospectively analyzed, and the patients were divided into two groups with 35 cases in each according to the different nursing measures, the control group adopted the conventional nursing model for nursing services, the observation group adopted predictive comprehensive nursing model services during the perioperative period of decompressive craniectomy, and the prognosis, curative effect, GCS score improvement and relevant severe complications of the two groups were compared and observed. Results The Glasgow GCS in the observation group was obviously higher than that in the control group after nursing, [(9.6±0.8) marks vs (8.2±0.7) marks], and the difference had obvious statistical significance, (T=7.8387, P=0.0000); the complication rate in the observation group was obviously lower than that in the control group, and the difference had statistical significance, (χ2=12.2465, P=0.0004). Conclusion Predictive comprehensive nursing model during the perioperative period of decompressive craniectomy for patients with severe craniocerebral injury can imp

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

130****9768 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档