王充《论衡》的实用文写作理论分析-theoretical analysis of practical writing in wang chongs lun heng.docxVIP

II II 实用文写作理论，对于当今实用文教学、实用文写作、实用文理论的 研究仍然具有重要的现实意义。 关键词：王充，实用文写作，文章功用，表现方法，写作主体， 启示意义 III III ABSTRACT Lun Heng condensed the painstaking efforts and the energy of the lifetime of Wang Chong. Although it is not a practical writing theory monographs, it permeated with the thoughts of his practical writing. Wang made a famous theory of five styles of writing, from which we can see his thoughts on the style of writing, glimpsing his attention on the practical wringting, especially on the official document and argumentative writing. In the research of Lun Heng,what’s more, we’ll find the active exploration and outstanding contributions of Wang Chong. The practical writing theory of Wang Chong is our precious cultural heritage. He attaches importance to practical writing, and deeply recognized the huge effect of practical writing in the society. He advocates the practical writing’s social function of “praising the superior and extolling the country, preaching the achievements, “increasing the good deed and decreasing the bad deed, persuading people to be good and punishing the evil”, “judging the dispute, discriminating the right and wrong”, and “writing and managing the memorial to the throne, dealing with the trouble”. He recognizes the different features and the law between the practical writing and the literary writing, so he requires the true content of practical writing which can arouse sincere feelings from your heart without increasing or decreasing. He asks that we should clear PAGE PAGE IV the purpose and the motivation of writing and express the point of view directly. As for the use of practical writing language, Wang is keen on the concise language and opposes to the flowery language. He holds the view that the most important thing is to say right rather than gorgeous. Wang Chong is especially disgusted with the “following suit and simulation”, so he advocates the innovation of thinking, and puts forward the writing view of “being different from seculari