不同聚合方式对软衬硅橡胶与聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯抗剪切强度影响.docVIP

不同聚合方式对软衬硅橡胶与聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯抗剪切强度的影响 　　[摘要] 目的 比较两种软衬硅橡胶在热固化和室温固化条件下，其与聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯（PMMA）的粘接强度。方法 水浴加热法制得50 mm×10 mm×3 mm PMMA试片48片，并随机分成4组。以Ufi Gel P（UGP）为软衬材料，制 　　作热固化组（A1组）和室温固化组（A2组）试件。以Silagum-Comfort（SLC）为软衬材料，制作热固化组（B1组）和室温固化组（B2组）试件。每组试件各6个。采用电子万能材料试验机对试件进行抗剪切强度测试，并在光学显微镜、扫描电子显微镜（SEM）下观察粘接界面、固化后软衬硅橡胶和打磨后PMMA的表面形态。结果 A1、A2、B1、B2组的抗剪切强度分别为（2.39±0.24）、（1.74±0.27）、（3.09±0.26）、（2.21±0.29）MPa。A1与A2、B1与B2、A1与B1、A2与B2组间的差异均有统计学意义（P0.05）。光学显微镜和SEM下可见，固化后UGP体部有大量的气泡，SLC无气泡；PMMA表面较为粗糙；各组粘接界面均连续、均匀、密实，A2、B2组粘接界面有须状微突起物。结论 UGP、SLC与PMMA的抗剪切强度均达到了0.44 MPa的临床最低使用标准；UGP与PMMA的抗剪切强度高于SLC与PMMA；热固化方式获得的抗剪切强度高于室温固化方式。 　　[关键词] 硅橡胶；软衬材料；抗剪切强度；聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯 　　[中图分类号] R 783.2 [文献标志码] A [doi] 10.7518/hxkq.2014.03.019 　　 　　Effect of different polymerization methods on shear bond strength between polymethyl methacrylate and silicone soft liner Zhang Fubao1, Shi Lianshui2, Deng Li1, Zhang Lin2, Zeng Yongfa2, Tu Tao3. (1. Dept. of Stomatology, The Third Affi-liated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330008, China; 2. Dept. of Prosthodontics, The Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330019, China; 3. Dept. of Stomatology, The People’s Hospital of Nanchang County, Nanchang 330200, China) 　　[Abstract] Objective To compare shear bond strength (SBS) between two types of silicone soft liner and polymethyl 　　methacrylate (PMMA) under the condition of heat curing and room temperature curing. Methods A total of 48 PMMA specimens (50 mm×10 mm×3 mm) were made by water-bath heating method, and randomly divided into four groups. By using Ufi Gel P (UGP) as soft liner material, group A1 was prepared under heat curing, and group A2 was prepared under room temperature curing. To form the other two groups, Silagum-Comfort (SLC) as soft-liner material was used. Group B1 was prepared under heat curing, and group B2 was prepared under room temperature curing. Shear bond strength (SBS) was tested by using the electronic universal testing machine. The adhesives layer and surface