- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
不同胆囊切除术对良性胆囊疾病患者预后影响
不同胆囊切除术对良性胆囊疾病患者预后的影响
[摘要] 目的 探讨单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILC)对良性胆囊疾病患者预后及并发症的影响。方法 2013年1月―2014年12月方便选取该院收治的120良性胆囊疾病患者为研究对象,根据患者治疗方法将其分为单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILC,n=60)及传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术组(CLC,n=60),对比分析两组患者手术情况及预后情况。结果 两组患者术中出血量、关腹所需时间差异无统计学意义(P0.05),SILC组手术时间(28.9±3.5) min、术中放置Trocar时间(6.2±0.8)min及术后住院时间(3.8±0.6) d短于CLC组(33.2±5.8) min、(7.8±2.4) min、(6.2±2.4) d,差异有统计学意义(P0.05),术后对两组随访6~12个月,SILC组复发率3.33%低于CLC组21.67%(P0.05),而SILC组满意率96.67%高于CLC组80.00%(P0.05)。 结论 SILC治疗良性胆囊疾病疗效显著,安全性高,患者术后复发率,可提高患者满意度,值得有条件的医院开展。
[关键词] 单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术;传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术;良性胆囊疾病;预后;并发症
[中图分类号] R657.4 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2016)04(a)-0016-03
[Abstract] Objective To discuss the effect of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery on prognosis and complications of patients with benign gallbladder disease. Methods 120 cases of patients with benign gallbladder disease admitted and treated in our hospital from January 2013 to December 2014 were selected as the research objects and divided into the single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery group and the traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery group with 60 cases in each, the operation situations and prognoses of the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results The differences in the intraoperative blood loss and abdominal closure time between the two groups had no statistical significance(P0.05), the operation time, intraoperative Trocar standing time and postoperative length of stay in the SILC group were shorter than those in the CLC group, [(28.9±3.5) min, (6.2±0.8) min, (3.8±0.6) d vs (33.2±5.8) min, (7.8±2.4) min, (6.2±2.4) d], and the differences had statistical significance(P0.05), both groups were followed up for 6-12 months after operation, and the recurrence rate in the SILC group was lower than that in the CLC group,(3.33% vs 21.67%)(P0.05), but the satisfactory rate in the SILC group was higher than that in the CLC group,(96.67% vs 80.00%),(P0.05). Conclusion The curative effect of SILC in treatment of benign gallbladder
原创力文档


文档评论(0)