不同口腔修复膜材料对牙种植引导骨再生效果评价及其机制分析.docVIP

不同口腔修复膜材料对牙种植引导骨再生的效果评价及其机制分析 　　[摘要] 目的 探究不同口腔修复膜材料对牙种植引导骨再生的临床应用疗效。方法 随机选取该院于2015年5月―2016年1月收治的100例牙种植患者为研究对象，随机分为观察组和对照组，每组50例。观察组使用海奥口腔修复膜在牙种植中引导骨再生，对照组则使用钛膜引导骨再生。对比观察两组的牙种植成功率和不良反应，比较两组患者1周骨厚度以及植骨厚度。 结果 观察组患者种植成功率为98.0%，对照组患者种植成功率为60.0%。差异具有统计学意义（P0.05）；观察组发生不良反应有2例（4.0%），而对照组中发生不良反应的有15例（30.0%），差异具有统计学意义（P0.05）；观察组患者的1周根骨厚度以及植骨厚度显著高于对照组患者，差异具有统计学意义（P0.05）。 结论 海奥口腔修复膜材料在临床上对于牙种植患者引导骨再生有较好的疗效，种植成功率高，不良反应小且低，并且能促进骨的再生，值得临床广泛运用，惠及广大患者。 　　[关键词] 口腔修复膜材料；牙种植；骨再生 　　[中图分类号] R4 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742（2016）09（b）-0053-03 　　[Abstract] Objective Exploration different Oral cavity repair Membrane material Dental ImplantingGuided Bone Regeneration ofClinical application efficacy. Methods Randomly selected in our hospital from May 2015 to January 2016 were treated 100 cases of Dental Implanting patients for the study， They were randomly divided into observation group and control group. Each group 50 example. Observer Grou pThe use Hai Au Oral rehabilitation film At the Dental Implanting Medium Guided Bone Regeneration. The control group is use Titanium film guided bone regeneration. Contrast Observe groups The two roups Of Dental Implanting success rate of And adverse reactions. Comparison of The two groups of patients one week bone thickness and Bone grafting thickness. Results Observation group Patient Planting the success rate Is 98.0%， The control group， patients planting success rate was 60.0%. The difference was statistically significant （P 0.05）； The observation group occur adverse reactions There are 2 cases were （4.0%）. And the In the control group Adverse reactions Occur in 15 patients （30.0%）， Differences was statistically significant （P 0.05） Observer Group patients 1 weekGengu thicknessas well as Bone grafting Thickness significantly higher than the control group of patients Differences has Statistical significance（P 0.05）. Conclusion Hai Au Oral rehabilitation film， Hai Au Oral rehabilitation Film material At clinical on For Dental Implanting Patients with