微小残留病灶检测判断急性淋巴细胞白血病预后临床研究.docVIP

微小残留病灶检测判断急性淋巴细胞白血病预后临床研究.doc

  1. 1、本文档共11页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
微小残留病灶检测判断急性淋巴细胞白血病预后临床研究

微小残留病灶检测判断急性淋巴细胞白血病预后临床研究   【摘要】 目的:探讨微小残留病灶(MRD)检测对急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)预后判断的临床价值。方法:选取本院收治的120例ALL患者作为研究对象,于诱导缓解治疗第33天、维持治疗第3个月分别对患者进行骨髓MRD检测,统计MRD阳性及阴性患者不同危险度及不同治疗时期的复发情况,同时比较诱导缓解治疗第33天不同骨髓缓解状况下MRD水平。结果:诱导缓解治疗第33天以及维持治疗第3个月,高危组的MRD阳性率均显著高于中危组及低危组,差异有统计学意义(P0.01);不同治疗时期MRD阳性复发率显著高于MRD阴性复发率,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);诱导缓解治疗第33天骨髓象达M1的患者MRD≥10-2比例显著低于M2与M3组,差异有统计学意义(P0.01);诱导缓解治疗第33天骨髓象达M1患者的复发率显著低于M2与M3组,差异有统计学意义(P0.01)。结论:MRD水平与ALL的预后有关,MRD阳性可作为ALL患者预后判断的重要因素。   【关键词】 微小残留病灶; 急性淋巴细胞白血病; 预后; 复发   【Abstract】 Objective:To investigate the clinical value of the detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) in the prognosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Method:120 patients with ALL were selected as the research objects,they were treated in the induction of remission in thirty-third days and maintenance therapy in the third months with bone marrow MRD detection, the MRD positive and negative patients with different risk and treatment period of relapse were compared. At the same time,the different bone marrow MRD levels of the induction of remission in thirty-third days were compared.Result:The induction of remission in the treatment of the thirty-third days and maintenance therapy in the third months, MRD positive rate of high risk group was significantly higher than that in middle risk group and low-risk group, the differences were statistically significant(P0.01);different treatment period MRD positive recurrence rate was significantly higher than that of MRD negative recurrence rate,the difference was statistically significant (P0.05); remission induction therapy with the thirty-third days bone marrow of M1 with minimal residual disease (MRD)≥10-2 was significantly lower than that of M2 and M3 group,the difference was statistically significant(P0.01); remission induction in the treatment of the thirty-third days bone marrow of M1 recurrence rate was significantly lower than that of M2 and M3 group,the difference was statistically significant(P0.01). Conclusion: MRD level is

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

3471161553 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档