核磁共振在膝骨性关节炎临床诊断中应用分析.docVIP

核磁共振在膝骨性关节炎临床诊断中应用分析.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
核磁共振在膝骨性关节炎临床诊断中应用分析

核磁共振在膝骨性关节炎临床诊断中应用分析   [摘要] 目的 探究核磁共振在膝骨关节炎临床诊断中的应用价值。 方法 随机选取该院2013年4月―2015年8月收治的100例膝骨关节炎患者为研究对象,在征得患者知情同意下首先对其实施关节镜检查,随后实施核磁共振检查,以临床病理学诊断结果为诊断“金”标准,比较两种诊断方式诊断准确率、漏诊率。 结果 100例膝骨关节炎患者临床病理学诊断结果为:半月板裂痕性损伤17例、韧带拉伤25例、韧带断裂28例、骨挫伤30例。关节镜检查诊断准确率为82%、漏诊率18%,而核磁共振检查诊断准确率为96%、漏诊率4%,组间差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。 结论 核磁共振诊断膝骨关节炎准确率高,能够满足临床诊断需求,值得在临床诊断工作中推广使用。   [关键词] 核磁共振;关节镜;膝骨关节炎   [中图分类号] R5 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2016)02(a)-0013-03   Application of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Clinical Diagnosis of Knee Osteoarthritis   LIU Huan-zhen   MRI Room, Liaocheng Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Liaocheng, Shandong Province, 252000 China   [Abstract] Objective To investigate the application value of nuclear magnetic resonance imaging in the clinical diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis. Methods 100 cases with knee osteoarthritis admitted in our hospital from April 2013 to August 2015 were selected as the subjects. Arthroscopy and nuclear magnetic resonance imaging was performed successively in the patients with the consent of them. And the results of clinical pathological diagnosis were used as the “golden” standard for comparing the diagnostic accurate rate and missed diagnosis rate of arthroscopy and nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Results The clinical pathological diagnosis results of the 100 cases with knee osteoarthritis showed that there were 17 cases of meniscus injury, 25 cases of ligament injury, 28 cases of ligament rupture, 30 cases of bone contusion. The diagnostic accurate rate and rate of missed diagnosis of arthroscopy was 82%, 18%, respectively, that of the nuclear magnetic resonance imaging was 96%, 4%, respectively, and the difference in the diagnostic accurate rate and rate of missed diagnosis between the two diagnostic methods was statistically significant (P0.05). Conclusion Magnetic resonance imaging can meet the needs of clinical diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis because of high diagnostic accurate rate, so it is worth popularizing in the

文档评论(0)

317960162 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档