核素骨扫描与磁共振全身扩散加权成像对骨转移瘤诊断价值对比分析.docVIP

核素骨扫描与磁共振全身扩散加权成像对骨转移瘤诊断价值对比分析.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
核素骨扫描与磁共振全身扩散加权成像对骨转移瘤诊断价值对比分析

核素骨扫描与磁共振全身扩散加权成像对骨转移瘤诊断价值对比分析   【摘要】目的对比分析核素骨扫描与磁共振全身扩散加权成像对骨转移瘤的诊断效能。方法选择2015年1月~2017年1月确诊为恶性肿瘤并疑似存在骨转移的患者55例,治疗前分别进行核素骨扫描和磁共振全身扩散加权成像,两种检查间隔0.05),而特异性比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05), 磁共振全身扩散加权成像检查的特异性更高。结论目前诊断恶性肿瘤骨转移仍以核素骨显像为首选,磁共振全身扩散加权成像作为补充检查手段可提高诊断的特异性,两者综合运用,有助于恶性肿瘤骨转移的早期诊断。   【关键词】核素骨扫描;全身扩散加权成像;骨转移瘤;诊断效能   中图分类号:R446 文献标识码:ADOI:10.3969/j.issn2018.02.023   Comparison and analysis of the diagnostic value of bone metastases with nuclide   bone scan and magnetic resonance general diffusionweighted imaging   TANG Xiaoyong1,ZHU Guangying2,LAI Changsheng3   (1.Nuclear Medicine Department,2.Department of Cardiovascular Diseases,3.Department   of Science and Education,Red Cross Hospital of Yulin,Yulin 537000,China)   【Abstract】ObjectiveTo compare the diagnostic efficacy of nuclide bone scan and magnetic resonance general diffusionweighted imaging (DWI) in the diagnosis of bone metastases.MethodsFrom January,2015 to January,2017,55 patients diagnosed as malignant tumors and suspected bone metastases were selected.And then,radionuclide bone scan and magnetic resonance general DWI was respectively performed before treatment.Interval between the two methods was less than 1 week.The conclusions of the two methods were analyzed,and sensitivity and specificity were compared.ResultsThe examination of the two methods suggested that 38 patients had bone metastases,26 of them were confirmed by bone biopsy and followup visit,of which 23 were positive in radionuclide bone scan,sensitivity was 95.83%,specificity was 70.96% and accuracy was 81.81%.Magnetic resonance general DWI was positive in 20 cases,sensitivity was 86.96%,specificity was 93.75% and accuracy was 90.91%.Difference of the sensitivity and accuracy between the two diagnostic methods was not statistically significant(P0.05),but that of specificity was statistically significant(P0.05).The specificity of magnetic resonance general DWI was higher.ConclusionAt present,radionuclide bone imaging is still the first ch

文档评论(0)

317960162 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档