- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
肝动脉栓塞化疗联合索拉菲尼治疗原发性肝癌临床研究
肝动脉栓塞化疗联合索拉菲尼治疗原发性肝癌临床研究
[摘要]目的 探讨肝动脉栓塞化疗(TACE)联合索拉菲尼治疗原发性肝癌的临床效果。方法 选择2009年1月~2011年4月鞍山市肿瘤医院收治的中晚期原发性肝癌患者114例,随机分为试验组和对照组,每组各57例。试验组采用TACE联合索拉菲尼治疗,对照组单纯采用TACE治疗。观察两组的治疗效果、甲胎蛋白水平以及卡氏评分改善情况;观察两组不良反应发生情况、皮肤反应以及5年内生存率。结果 试验组总有效率(73.68%)显著高于对照组(49.12%)(P0.01)。治疗后,两组患者甲胎蛋白浓度变化和卡氏评分均较治疗前显著改善(P0.05),且试验组明显优于对照组(P0.01)。治疗期间,两组患者均未发生严重不良反应,试验组皮肤反应发生率(64.9%)明显高于对照组(10.5%)(P0.01)。试验组患者5年内的生存率均显著高于对照组(P0.01)。结论 采用肝动脉栓塞化疗联合索拉菲尼治疗原发性肝癌可以取得显著的近期疗效,可明显改善患者的甲胎蛋白?舛缺浠?和卡氏评分,不良反应较轻微,远期疗效满意,值得在临床上大力推广。
[关键词]肝动脉栓塞化疗;索拉菲尼;原发性肝癌;临床疗效
[中图分类号] R735.7 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721(2016)11(a)-0077-03
[Abstract]Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with Sorafenib in the treatment of primary hepatic carcinoma.Methods One hundred and fourteen patients with advanced primary hepatic carcinoma admitted in Tumor Hospital of Anshan City from January 2009 to April 2011 were randomly divided into experimental group and control group,57 cases in each group.Patients of the experimental group were treated with TACE combined with Sorafenib,and patients of the control group were treated with TACE alone.The therapeutic effect,concentration of AFP,and Karnofsky score of the two groups were observed;adverse reaction,skin reaction and 5-year survival rate were observed.Results The total effective rate in the experimental group (73.68%) was significantly higher than that in the control group (49.12%) (P0.01).After treatment,the AFP concentration and Karnofsky score of the two groups were significantly improved compared with before treatment,and the experimental group was better than the control group (P0.01).During the treatment,there was no serious adverse reactions were observed in the two groups.The incidence of skin reaction in the experimental group(64.9%) was significantly higher than that in the control group(10.5%) (P0.01).The 5 years survival rate of the patients in the trial group was higher than that in the control group (P0.01
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- IFC050-Modbus通讯说明文件.docx VIP
- 《金川雪梨膏》标准文本.pdf VIP
- 2025年中国冷藏汽车行业市场深度评估及投资策略咨询报告.docx
- 市政管网工程项目施工方案施工组织设计.doc VIP
- 认证质量管理(ISO9001)手册(质量管理体系).pdf VIP
- 中国神经外科重症患者感染诊治专家共识CB.ppt VIP
- GB50366-2005 地源热泵系统工程技术规范.docx VIP
- SOLAS公约2016年中文综合文本(船海人版)- 第III章 救生设备和装置.pdf VIP
- 2024年南京市浦口区中医院招聘考试真题.docx VIP
- 中国谷物播种机市场供需现状及投资战略研究报告.docx
原创力文档


文档评论(0)