评价连续性血液净化在重症医学中应用效果.docVIP

评价连续性血液净化在重症医学中应用效果.doc

此“医疗卫生”领域文档为创作者个人分享资料,不作为权威性指导和指引,仅供参考
  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
评价连续性血液净化在重症医学中应用效果

评价连续性血液净化在重症医学中应用效果   【摘要】 目的 评价连续性血液净化技术在重症医学中的应用效果。方法 回顾性分析83例接受连续性血液净化治疗患者的临床资料, 记录患者治疗后的情况。结果 83例患者中, 33例痊愈, 31例好转, 19例死亡, 死亡率为22.89%。19例死亡患者中, 2例为恶性血液疾病患者, 4例为脓毒症并多脏器衰竭患者(包括肾衰竭), 8例为重度心力衰竭伴肾衰竭患者, 5例为肾衰竭患者。47例未死亡肾衰竭患者治疗前后血肌酐值、血尿素氮比较, 差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。10例未死亡脓毒症患者治疗后体温为(36.63±0.60)℃, 明显低于治疗前的(38.20±0.91)℃, 差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。死亡患者急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分(APACHEII评分)为(29.74±2.57)分, 明显高于未死亡患者的(22.09±2.47)分, 且死亡患者ICU住院时间为(13.31±8.18)d, 明显多于未死亡患者的(9.89±5.50)d, 差异均具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 连续性血液净化技术在重症医学中的广泛应用, 可有效救治重症患者。   【关键词】 连续性血液净化;技术;重症医学   DOI:10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2016.35.039   【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate application effect by continuous blood purification in critical care medicine. Methods A retrospective analysis was made on clinical data of 83 patients receiving continuous blood purification for treatment, and records were made on their status after treatment. Results Among the 83 patients, there were 33 healed cases, 31 improved cases, and 19 death cases, with mortality rate as 22.89%. Among the 19 death cases, there were 2 cases with malignant hematologic diseases, 4 cases with sepsis and complicated multiple organ failure (including renal failure), 8 cases with severe heart failure and renal failure, and 5 cases with renal failure. The difference of serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen before and after treatment had statistical significance in 47 survived cases with renal failure (P0.05). Body temperature after treatment was (36.63±0.60)℃ in 10 survived cases with sepsis, and it was obviously lower than (38.20±0.91)℃ before treatment, and the difference had statistical significance (P0.05). Death cases had much higher acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHEⅡ) score as (29.74±2.57) points than (22.09±2.47) points in survived cases. Death cases also had much longer ICU stay time as (13.31±8.18) d than (9.89±5.50) d in survived cases. Their differences all had statistical significance (P0.05). Conclusion Wide application of continuous blood pu

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

bokegood + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档