电子证据司法运用问题分析-法律专业论文.docxVIP

2 掌握着大量的优质资源，电子证据鉴定人的准入资质没有统一性要求，所做出的 鉴定意见结论简单，论证不足；另一方面，电子证据鉴定应有的中立客观性与现 有条件下侦查依附性形成了种种矛盾，表现为鉴定人先入为主的有罪推定观念和 辩护律师无法有效质证，这些矛盾导致电子证据的鉴定备受争议。在电子证据审 查判断环节上，法官对于电子证据技术原理不了解，在电子证据审查判断中对于 鉴定意见具有依赖性，导致法官对于证据真实性审查判断能力弱；另一方面，在 电子证据与传统证据并存的情况下，法官更倾向于传统证据，或者对于电子证据 加倍小心，电子证据的证明力被弱化。 第四部分主要提出了电子证据司法运用规范化的完善建议。首先，确立电子 证据的特殊证据规则：1.电子证据对于最佳证据规则的冲击需要通过原件拟制规 则予以补充；2.对电子证据的主体和程序予以规范，明确何种证据属???合法证据， 何种证据属于非法证据予以排除,以此避免电子证据被转化运用等的不规范情 形。其次，对电子证据取证主体资格统一化认证、取证程序规范化操作和取证对 象法律确认，构建统一规范的电子证据取证制度，以保证电子证据取证环节的技 术层面和法律层面的双重规范。再次，对鉴定资源优化配置，鉴定人员规范化管 理以及鉴定文书实质专业化设计，构建能够辅助电子证据的审查判断的独立鉴定 体制，以此将电子证据司法运用纳入规范化的轨道。 关键词：电子证据；证据规则；电子证据取证；电子证据鉴定；电子证据审 查判断  1 Abstract The standardization of the electronic evidence in judicial application is one of the important goal of research on the theory and practice of electronic evidence, building a scientific system in the specification of the electronic evidence in judicial use has extremely important practical significance to ensure the smooth operation of the criminal case dealt with, to punish crime accurately. Along with the an increase in the number of computer crime and criminal cases involving electronic evidence, how to accurately regulate use of electronic evidence become one of the problems of the present judicial practice, however, the use of electronic evidence in our country judicial present situation that the research of the legal aspects lags far behind the research of technical aspects. The independent evidence rules of electronic evidence and use the specification, therefore, should be further improved, with the aid of electronic evidence is listed as a separate species, to build the system of the electronic evidence of in China, in order to meet the requirements of electronic evidence in judicial application. This article consists of four parts, a total of about 30000 words. The first part mainly aimed at the basic problems analyzed in judicial application of electronic evidence. Electronic evidence legislation as a separate legal category has b