两种不同外科手术方式治疗急性脑出血临床对比的研究.docVIP

两种不同外科手术方式治疗急性脑出血临床对比的研究 　　【摘要】 目的：比较两种不同的外科手术方式对于治疗急性脑出血的临床效果，并对其进行分析。方法：查阅并统计2011年4月-2013年10月在笔者所在医院治疗的86例急性脑出血患者的临床资料，其中43例患者行小骨窗血肿清除术，作为对照组；43例患者行微创血肿清除术，作为观察组。比较两组患者的手术治疗效果。结果：经治疗后，观察组患者的手术时间及住院时间均明显短于对照组，术中出血量明显少于对照组，差异均有统计学意义（P0.05）。观察组患者术后恢复程度明显优于对照组，术后病死率明显低于对照组，差异均有统计学意义（P0.05）。结论：微创血肿清除术在临床上具有较好的治疗效果，值得推广。 　　【关键词】 外科手术； 急性脑出血； 治疗效果 　　中图分类号 R743.34 文献标识码 B 文章编号 1674-6805（2016）12-0014-02 　　Clinical Comparative Study of Two Different Surgical Procedures for the Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage/ZHAO Bi.//Chinese and Foreign Medical Research，2016，14（12）：14-15 　　【Abstract】 Objective：To compare the clinical effect of two different surgical procedures for the treatment of acute cerebral hemorrhage，and analyze it. 　　Method：The clinical data of 86 patients with acute cerebral hemorrhage admitted to our hospital from April 2011 to October 2013 were reviewed and counted. 　　43 patients with small bone window craniotomy were selected as the control group，43 patients with minimally invasive hematoma removal were selected as the observation group.The effect of surgical treatment between the two groups were compared.Result：After treatment，the operation time and length of stay in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group，the intraoperative blood loss of the observation group was significantly less than that of the control group，the differences were statistically significant（P0.05）.The postoperative recovery degree of the observation group was significantly better than the control group，the postoperative mortality of the observation group was significantly lower than the control group，the differences were statistically significant（P0.05）.Conclusion：Minimally invasive hematoma removal surgery has a great effect in clinical treatment，is worth of popularizing. 　　【Key words】 Surgical operation； Acute cerebral hemorrhage； Treatment effect 　　First-author’s address：The People’s Hospital of Wenshan Prefecture，Wenshan 663000，Chi