2013职称英语新增阅读理解.doc

  1. 1、本文档共26页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
13年职称英语考试用书(理工类)教材 2013 年职称英语等级考试用书(理工类) ? 注: ? 1、+表示A级文章;*表示B即文章;其他为C级文章;?2、阅读理解,请参见第3页;完形填空,请参见第20页;3、2013年词汇部分、阅读判断、概括大意和完成句子、补全短文与2012年教材相比未作任何变化。 ? 2013年职称英语(理工类)新增文章学习 ? 阅读理解 ? 第十一篇 When?Our?Eyes?Serve?Our?Stomach?Our?senses?aren’t?just?delivering?a?strict?view?of?what’s?going?on?in?the;they’re?affected?by?what’s?going?on?in?our?heads.?A?new?study?finds?that?hungry?people?see?food-related?words?more?clearly?than?people?who’ve?just?eaten.?Psychologists?have?known?for?decades?that?what’s?going?on,?inside?our?head?affects?our?senses.?For?example,?poorer?children?think?coins?are?larger?than?they?are,?and?hungry?people?think?pictures?of?food?are?brighter.?Remi?Radel?of?University?of?Nice?Sophia-Antipolis,France,wanted?to?investigate?how?this?happens.?Does?it?happen? right?away?as?the?brain?receives?signals?from?the?eyes?or?a?little?later?as?the?brain’s?high-level?thinking?processes?get?involved.?Radel?recruited?42?students?with?a?normal?body?mass?index.?On?the?day?of?his?or?her?test,?each?student?was?told?to?arrive?at?the?lab?at?noon?after?three?or?four?hours?of?not?eating.?Then?they?were?told?there?was?a?delay.?Some?were?told?to?come?back?in?10?minutes;?others?were?given?an?hour?to?get?lunch?first.?So?half?the?students?were?hungry?when?they?did?the?experiment?and?the?other?half?had?just?eaten.?For?the?experiment,?the?participant?looked?at?a?computer?screen.?One?by?one,?80?words?flashed?on?the?screen?for?about?l/300th?of?a?second?each.?They?flashed?at?so?small?a?size?that?the?students?could?only?consciously?perceive.?A?quarter?of?the?words?were?food-related.?After?each?word,each?person?was?asked?how?bright?the?word?was?and? asked?to?choose?which?of?two?words?they’d?seen?—a?food-related?word?like?cake?or?a?neutral?word?like?boat.?Each?word?appeared?too?briefly?for?the?participant?to?really?read?it.? ? Hungry?people?saw?the?food-related?words?as?brighter?and?were?better?at?identifying?food-?related?words.? Because?the?word?appeared?too?quickly?for?them?to?be?reliably

文档评论(0)

wx171113 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档