城市房屋征收补偿若干问题研究民商法学专业论文.docxVIP

China’s cities are still in the process of urban upsurge caused by the imposition. As the current lack of clear laws and regulations impose the principle of compensation, the compensation standard is still lack of fairness, compensation disputes judicial relief mechanism is limited, the objective cause to be imposed and imposed the two sides continue to dispute the issue of compensation is reasonable and casualties caused by a series of bloody events, become a hazard to social stability and harmonious development of the instability factor. Especially the elimination of violence had been sent to the demolition of hopes for the new compensation regulations impose state-owned land on the housing levy and Compensation Ordinance was January 21, 2011 has been promulgated, the housing levy violence are still staged. The reason, both because of the existing legal framework arising from the housing levy compensation still can not be properly addressed. Therefore, a careful analysis of the current system of compensation for expropriation problems and propose improvements to the legal significance positive. In this article I shall discussed from four aspects: The first section briefly discusses the concept of compensation for expropriation and characteristics. With relevant laws and regulations on the “Urban Housing”, “collection” of their provisions, summarized the concept of housing the collection of compensation, and then analyze the housing levy administrative actions and civil compensation has dual properties of behavior, more focused on protecting the legitimate rights and interests of the legal charge characteristics; The second part of the statement of the legal system imposed after the founding of our country’s development process. This section briefly imposed after the founding of the legal system sort out the changes in the development, analysis shows that our early days of mandatory unpaid levy from landlords and housing laws and regulations of the existing coll