2018届高考英语二轮复习疯狂专练二十一模块5GreatScientists含解析.docVIP

2018届高考英语二轮复习疯狂专练二十一模块5GreatScientists含解析.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
2018届高考英语二轮复习疯狂专练二十一模块5GreatScientists含解析

PAGE PAGE 9 疯狂专练二十一 模块5 Unit 1 Great Scientists Ⅰ Ⅰ.单项选择 1.【2017·北京卷】32. Jim has retired, but he still remember the happy time _______ with his students. A. to spend B. spend C. spending D. spent 【答案】D 【解析】句意:Jim已经退休了,但是他依然记得和学生一起度过的快乐时光。句子已经有了谓语,空格只能填非谓语动词,逻辑主语是time,和spend 之间是被动关系,故用过去分词spent。 考点:考查非谓语动词。 2.【2016·江苏】28.In art criticism, you must assume the artist has a secret message ________within the work. A. to hide B. hidden C. hiding D. being hidden 【答案】B 【解析】考查分词做定语。本句中名词短语a secret message与动词hide构成被动关系,所以使用过去分词短语hidden within the work在句中做后置定语,修饰名词短语a secret message, 相当于定语从句that is hidden within the work。A C项表示主动含义,D项强调正在进行,与语境不符。故B正确。 3.【2016·浙江】10.To return to the problem of water pollution, Id like you to look at a study _______ in Australia in 2012. A. having conducted B. to be conducted C. conducting D. conducted 【答案】D 【解析】句意:为了回到水污染的问题,我想要你研究一下2012年澳大利亚进行的研究。使用非谓语动词作定语,study和conduct是动宾关系,用过去分词作定语。B项也表示被动,但是不定式的被动,表示将要发生的事情。故选D。 Ⅱ Ⅱ.阅读理解 A 【2017·衡阳高三一模】There has been a controversy between animal rights supporters and scientists about whether it is right to use animals to find cures for human diseases in experimental research. Personally, if there are no other alternatives, and if it is possible that this will contribute to science, animals may be used for experimental research. The animal rights supporters label scientists as “cruel” for causing animals to die in medical experiments, while they do not oppose the people, mostly farmers, who kill animals for food. Some even claim that people and animals are equal and they should be treated equally. But can the death of an animal be the same thing as the death of a person? I think causing animals to die for science or for saving human lives may be considered ethical (伦理的), if it will contribute to the advancement of science and human health in general. Another basic argument of animal rights supporters is that people and animals are different genetically.

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

果冻宝盒535888 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档