法庭审判中模糊限制语的语用研究英语语言文学专业论文.docxVIP

山东大学硕士学位论文Contents 山东大学硕士学位论文 Contents Abstract 1 摘要 ．．iii List of Tables ．．iv Chapter One Introduction ．．1 1．1 Background ofthe Study ．1 1．2 ObjectiVes a11d Si盟ificallce ofme Study 2 1．3 OrgaJlization ofthe Thesis 3 Chapter T’)’ro Litemture Review ．5 2．1 General Introduction ofHedges 5 2．1．1 Definition ofHedges 5 2．1．2 Classification ofHedges ．8 2．2 Pragmatic Approach to Hedges ．1 5 2．2．1 The Pragmatic Approach ．1 5 2．2．2 OtherApproaches to Hedges 一16 2．3 Hedges in Legal Doc啪ents a11d Counroom Hals 1 8 2．3．1 The Relation between Law aIld LaIlguage ．1 8 2．3．2 PreVious Studies on Hedges in Legal Documents ．19 2．3．3 PreVious Studies on Hedges in Co咖om Trials ．20 2．3．3．1 Hedges Used by Participants InVolVed in Courtroom Trials ．．20 2．3．3．2 PerspectiVes ofTheories Used in the Study ofHedges ．21 2．4 Summ研 22 Chapter Three Theoretical Basis and Methodolo斟 ．23 3．1 T11eoretical Basis ofthe Study 23 3．1．1 Hedges as Pragmatic Vagueness ．23 3．1．2 CooperatiVe Principle and Hedges ．24 3．1．3 Politeness Principle and Hedges ．．27 3．1．4 Su瑚maJv ．31 万方数据 山东大学硕士学位论文3．2 山东大学硕士学位论文 3．2 Method0109y ofthe Study ．．28 3．2．1 Research Questions ．29 3．2．2 Data Sources 29 3．2．3 Criteria for the Data Collection ．30 3．2．4 Procedures ofthe Study ．3 1 Chapter Four Results and Discussion 33 4．1 Frequency and Distribution ofUse ofHedges in Courtroom Trials ．33 4．1．1 Adaptors 35 4．1．2 Rounders 36 4．1．3 Plausibility Shields 37 4．1．4 Attributi∞Shields 39 4．2 Comparison of Hedges Employed by Defense auld Plaimifrs’La、Ⅳyers ．40 4．2．1 Similarities ofHedges Employed by Defense and P1aintifrs’La、Ⅳyers 40 4．2．2 Differences ofHedges Employed by Defense a11d Plaimiff-s’La、vyerS 42 4．3 La、Vyers’use ofWitnesses’Hedges as a Defense Strategy 44 4．4 Analysis ofHedges on the Basis ofPragmatic Principles ．．46 4．4．1 Analysis of Hedges on the Basis of CooperatiVe Principle ．46 4．4．1．1 Hedges and Ma)(im of Quantity 47 4．4．1．2 Hedges and Maxim ofQuality ．47 4．4．1．3 Hedges and MaXim of Relation 一48 4．4．1．4 Hedges aJl