卞之琳译哈姆雷特的风格传递分析英语语言文学专业论文.docxVIP

.，，tf ，， .，，tf ，，· 习胁 b a a 1  、- 、 a·-a，.， ‘UH a· ， ，、 II{1{I II{1{I II I II IIII II{I III ＼1 944339 ＼ Abstract Nida and Taber defined that translating consists in reproducing in the receptor language the closest natural equivalent of the source-language message first in terms of meaning and secondly in terms of style(Nida＆Taber,1982，P．30)．Besides，Liu Miqing once stressed we should maintain the‘adaptation’of the style in translated text to the original one for the grasp of the whole meaning in source text which would be out of the question if the onginal style is ignored in target text(RfJ宓庆，2005b，P． 239)．But，what style is and how to reproduce it have been discussed hotly among scholars and translators for a long time．According to Liu Miqing，language is the f carrier of style．Not only is style embodied in the content of a work，but also found in its form of expression． One of the unique characteristics ofHamlet，as analyzed in this thesis，is that it is basically written in blank verse which is a literary form absent from Chinese literature． As a result，various literary forms have been taken in the translation．Roughly,these versions can be divided into two groups：one being VerSe translated into prose represented by Zhu Shenghao and the other being verse into VerSe by Bian Zhilin respectively．However,there is no consensus on whether blank verse should be rendered into verse or prose．Those who favor prose version argue prose is smooth， natural and easy to understand and verse version is always being doubted about whether it Can be performed onto stage．On the other hand，those who approve translating VerSe into verse hold that the poetic version is more faithful to the original form．Most discussions have been focused on the unique style of verse drama Hamlet in terms of its practicability on the stage．In the past few decades，a large number of researches have been done on the Chinese versions of Hamlet,however,inadequate attention has been paid to Bian Zhilin’S ver