教唆犯罪实行过限问题研究-刑法学专业论文.docxVIP

的教唆背景中，通过主客观的分析，明确了教唆犯罪实行过限的思路。在实践层 的教唆背景中，通过主客观的分析，明确了教唆犯罪实行过限的思路。在实践层 面，以结果加重犯和想象竞合犯为主要内容，结合主客观的标准，分析了在不同 情形下的认定标准。结果加重犯存在“故意”加重和“过失”加重的情形，针对 不同的故意内容和不同的行为，在认定标准上进行具体界定。教唆犯罪实行过限 在想象竞合犯中主要是此罪的实行要靠彼罪的实施来实现，从主客观的层面统一 分析教唆者和被教唆者的行为，为司法实践提供了一种解决问题的办法。 关键字：教唆犯罪 实行过限教唆类型结果加重犯 IV 万方数据 AbstractAbetting Abstract Abetting crime practiced limit has been a problem of controversy in theoretical circles． The difficulty is bow to define a limit，for a similar situation may be identified as different， and there is no a unified standard．The SO．called”abetting crime practiced limit”means that in the process of committing a clime，the instigated person goes beyond the scope of instigation and infringed the new legal interests．But for bow to define intentional range of the instigator, bow to define the crime of instigated person,bow to classify correctly practice OVer limit or not and SO on,have always been the problem that confused judiciary．The paper starts from the current theoretical status and judicial practice，puts the concept of abetting crime practiced limit as the beginning，and then gradually launches the elaboration． First of all，this paper introduces the concept of abetting crime practiced limit and the constitution of the crime．Starting from the development process of practiced hmit，this paper is based on the deal about practiced limit since ancient times and the modern times，and combines with the current judicial practice to define abetting crime practiced limit．On the basis of introducing the concept of Abetting crime practiced limit，this paper introduces the abetting crime practiced limit from the three aspects of the subject condition,subjective condition and objective condition． Secondly,this article introduces the theory of abetting crime practiced limit and the staIldaId definition of the crime in the current theoretical field．At present，there exist some theories：the intentional theory of Abetting crime，the unforeseen theory,the meaning of the C0mnlon act．and the con