含砷酸性废水无害化处理及渣形态和稳定性分析.docVIP

doi：10.3969/j.issn.1007-7545.2018.05.016含砷酸性废水无害化处理及渣形态与稳定性分析 doi：10.3969/j.issn.1007-7545.2018.05.016 庄荣传，范道焱，陈征贤，许晓阳，林国钦，王弘，蔡创开，熊明，黄怀国，王春 (低品位难处理黄金资源综合利用国家重点实验室，福建龙岩 364200) 摘要：含砷难处理金矿石经过加压氧化预工艺处理后产生含砷和铁均较高的酸性废水，采用两段中和法和针铁矿法对其进行无害化处理并对渣中砷的形态进行分析。结果表明，两段中和法和针铁矿法均可高效去除酸性水中的游离态砷和铁，两者的去除率均超过99.9%。与两段中和法相比较，针铁矿法具有处理出水中砷浓度更低、中和浆液的沉降效果好、渣量小、含砷渣的稳定性高等优势。 关键词：含砷废水；两段中和法；针铁矿法；加压氧化 中图分类号：X703;X758 文献标志码：A 文章编号：1007-7545（2018）05-0000-00 Harmless Treatment of Arsenic-bearing Acidic Wastewater and Speciation and Stability Analysis of Slag ZHUANG Rong-chuan, FAN Dao-yan, CHEN Zheng-xian, XU Xiao-yang, LIN Guo-qin, WANG Hong, CAI Chuang-kai, XIONG Ming, HUANG Huai-guo, WANG Chun (State Key Laboratory of Comprehensive Utilization of Low Grade and Refractory Gold Ores, Longyan 364200, Fujian, China) Abstract：Acidic wastewater with high arsenic and iron concentrations from pressure oxidation pretreatment of arsenic-bearing refractory gold ore was treated by two stage neutralization and goethite process. As speciation and long term behavior in slag was analyzed. The results show that both methods can effectively remove free state arsenic and iron from aqueous solution with removal rate of both 99.9% above. Compared with two stage neutralization process, goethite process exhibits superior performance of lower As concentration in disposal waste water, better settling performance of settling rate and underflow concentration of neutralized slurry, fewer slag quantity, and higher long term stability of arsenic-bearing slag. Key words：arsenic-bearing wastewater; two-stage neutralization; goethite process; pressure oxidation 随着易处理黄金资源的开发殆尽，难处理黄金资源已成为黄金生产的主要原料来源。据统计，大部分难处理金矿石其砷金质量比高达2 000︰1，这意味着大规模难处理黄金资源的开发必然会产生大量的含砷废水、废弃物。砷及其含砷化合物均属于剧毒性原生类物质，我国规定砷为I类污染物，属于优先控制污染物之一，污水综合排放标准规定为0.50 mg/L，而我国饮用水标准GB5749-2006中规定砷浓度不高于0.05 mg/L，甚至限制在0.01 mg/L以下[1]。目前，含砷废水主要处理方法有石灰沉淀法[2]、石灰—铁盐法[3]、多级沉淀法[4]、硫化钠法[5]、Fenton试剂—石灰铁盐法[6]、氧化—铁盐法[7]、微生物法[8]、人工湿地法[9]、吸附法[10]、纳米零价铁法[11]等，各方法均有其适用范围。 难处理金矿石加压氧化预处理通过在高温高