律师意见不被回应的原因、危害及对策研究法学理论专业毕业论文.docxVIP

1 1 摘 要 律师制度是司法公正的重要保障机制，律师意见在司法判决中得到有效回应是律师 在诉讼中发挥作用的重要体现。法律虽然赋予了律师以辩护权，但对于庭审中未回应律 师辩护意见或者代理意见时，并不存在相应的救济机制。这是一个重大的制度缺陷，对 司法公正会产生重要影响。 律师意见不被回应，既有法律制度上的缺失，也有法官的观念因素，在一定程度上 是律师地位不对等的体现。律师意见不被回应，不利于提高律师的法律执业能力。当事 人主要关注律师与法官的私人关系，而不是其执业能力，促使律师更注重维系与法官的 私人关系；律师意见不被回应的最大危害还在于，它会造成司法对公正的背离，导致一 些枉法裁判或者误判，不能形成司法过程的权力制衡机制，对法官公正司法失去有效的 监督和制衡作用。而司法不公，必然危及社会稳定，很多涉诉信服不能说完全与此无关。 要求法院对律师意见进行有效回应，对不予回应的充分说明理由，就成为司法过程中的 重要诉求。 在强化法院回应律师意见方面，一方面，要强化判决书的说理要求，对判决结论要 进行法律和事实方面的论证，对律师意见不予采信时要说明理由；另一方面，可以从制 度上创设一项律师意见不被回应的审查请求权，作为一项救济性权利，以确保律师辩护 权的实现，有效维护当事人的合法权益。同时，还可以参照国外和我国香港地区的相关 制度，设置律师意见不被回应时的独立上诉权，这是保证律师作用有效实现的重要制度 机制。 通过强化律师意见对司法判决的影响力，能够达成司法过程的制衡效应，实现司法 公正，保障公民的合法权利；同时能够促进律师行业的良性竞争和健康发展，提升律师 的执业能力及其法律素养，对我国诉讼制度的完善也具有重要意义。 关键词：律师意见；司法回应；诉讼作用；上诉权 1 1 2 2 Abstract In our present framework of legal system, judiciary does not endow any remedy to the denial of lawyers’ defensive or agent opinions in court trails. There is also no clear provision to ensure the announcement of lawyers’ defensive or agent opinions in court trails. All these lead to gaps in mobilizing the countering between both parties to ensure the rights of legal parties and judicial balance, which can not fully show the role that lawyers play in the court trail and thus urge this professional group to seek other ways to exert influence on cases, causing the failed play of the lawyers’ legal skills in the court trail. Today, case parties entrust legal issues to professional lawyers against the background of more and more rigorous legal rules. However, the parties can not judge the lawyers from their legal skills, leading to the failure of the law of selecting the superior and eliminating the inferior. Consequently, the lawyers gain more entrusted cases and win lawsuits by approaching judges or seek other non-legal ways to bribe. In the long run, lawyers rely more on their relationships with judicial system instead of improving their own legal knowledge through legitimate ways to influence the judges. Furthermore, the ma