论未注册商标侵害行为的法律规制-法律学专业论文.docx 28页

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 约2.62万字
  • 2019-06-05 发布

论未注册商标侵害行为的法律规制-法律学专业论文.docx

文档工具:
    1. 1、本文档共28页,可阅读全部内容。
    2. 2、本文档内容版权归属内容提供方,所产生的收益全部归内容提供方所有。如果您对本文有版权争议,可选择认领,认领后既往收益都归您。
    3. 3、本文档由用户上传,本站不保证质量和数量令人满意,可能有诸多瑕疵,付费之前,请仔细先通过免费阅读内容等途径辨别内容交易风险。如存在严重挂羊头卖狗肉之情形,可联系本站下载客服投诉处理。
    4. 文档侵权举报电话:19940600175。
    PAGE PAGE 1 Abstract The Papers is used a case of Mongolian Cow “Sour Yogurt” as the paper’s opening , using The Anti-Unfair Competition Law as Perspective, dividing the papers into three parts to discuss the Unregistered trademark violations in the applicable law by using the methods of Empirical analysis, which make the Unregistered trademark violations will to be further improved in current laws. Full text is three parts, content abstracts mark as follows: In The Part I, it extended out the legal thoughts of Unregistered trademark violations by introducting a case of Mongolian Cow “Sour Yogurt”.in “Mongolian Cow Dairy Company suit Dong Jian Jun and Henan Anyang Snow White Dairy Industry Co., Ltd”, in the first instance Hu He Hao Te City Intermediate People's Court in accordance with the article 14 of the well-known trademark of <Trademark Law> indentified that unregistered trademarks “ Sour Yogurt”as the well-known trademarks that used by the Mongolian Cow Dairy company, and ultimately make judgement of stopping infringement immediately of Mongolian Cow Dairy Company trademark’s “Sour Yogurt” and any unfair competition. The defendant refused to accept the judgement of first instance, appeal to the Higher People's Court of Inner Mongolia, Inner Mongolia Higher People's Court made a ruling of first instance verdict. This is the first non-registration of a well-known trademarks in our courty through civil procedures. In this case, the court is consider unregistered “Sour Yogurt” as the well-known trademarks, which make the final judgement of the won for Mengniu Dairy company. The author thinks, from the perspective of justice, this verdict is clearly correct, but in the application of law is a question. If directly according the article 5, paragraph 2 of <Anti-Unfair Competition Law> finds defendant taking market confusion actions by” use well-known commodity’s specific names, packaging, decorating in Unauthorized, or use similar well-known comm

    您可能关注的文档

    文档评论(0)

    • 内容提供方:131****9843
    • 审核时间:2019-06-05
    • 审核编号:8113111127002025

    相似文档