论行政诉讼的模式-诉讼法学专业论文.docxVIP

I I 内容摘要 二十世纪以来，国际政治经济形式发生了翻天覆地的变化，行政权的行使范 围不断扩大、公民的法律意识显著增强，由此产生了诉讼爆炸、诉讼迟延、诉讼 成本昂贵等问题，对原有的行政诉讼模式带来了冲击。我国现行的行政诉讼模式 带有强烈的职权主义色彩，随着市场经济的确立和完善，职权主义行政诉讼模式 的弊端日益凸显。法律的发展、制度的改革要求对原有的行政诉讼模式进行完善， 以更好的实现行政诉讼目的。本文试图对我国的行政诉讼模式的完善进行探讨。 第一章是行政诉讼模式的类型。本文从介绍国外典型行政诉讼模式入手，采 用历史分析法和比较分析法，介绍了当事人诉讼模式和职权主义诉讼模式两种行 政诉讼模式各自的内涵和理论背景。然后对两种诉讼模式进行比较分析，并总结 出行政诉讼模式的发展趋势。 第二章是对我国现行行政诉讼模式的特点和弊端进行分析。我国现行行政诉 讼模式的特点是诉讼程序中法院地位的强势性，证据收集中法院职权的主动性， 庭审过程中法院审理的纠问性，案件执行中法院作用的主导性。我国现行行政诉 讼模式的不足主要有法官角色错位，庭审流于形式，诉讼效率低下，忽视审判程 序。 第三章是对我国行政诉讼模式的完善。文章首先分析了影响我国行政诉讼模 式完善的因素，主要包括诉讼模式的发展趋势，传统法律文化的影响，行政诉讼 价值和目的，行政诉讼本身的特点。然后在此基础之上论证了我国理想行政诉讼 模式的选择。最后对我国理想行政诉讼模式进行制度设计，主要包括庭前程序的 改革，审查对象的确立，审查方式的更新，证据规则的完善和调解制度的设立。 关键词：诉讼模式 当事人主义 职权主义 职权—当事人主义 II II Abstract Since the 20th century, the international political economic form has changed greatly, enforcement of executive power range has expanded constantly, legal consciousness of citizen has strengthened notably. Therefore there are a lot of problems such as lawsuit exploding, lawsuit delaying, expensive question of lawsuit. They have brought and assaulted the already existing administrative procedural mode. There is strong doctrine color of functions and powers in our country's current administrative procedural mode. With establishment and completion of market economy, the drawback of the doctrine administrative procedural mode of the functions and powers is much critical day by day. The development of the law and reformation of system require that administrative procedural mode must be changed completely. It aims to realize administrative procedural purpose. This article attempts to carry on the discussion to the completion of the administrative procedural mode of our country. Chapter one is the kind study of the administrative procedural mode. This article adopts the historical analytic approach and comparative analytic approach to introduce the foreign typical administrative procedural mode. Then it introduces party lawsuit mode and functions and powers doctrine lawsuit m