炎琥宁与利巴韦林治疗小儿急性上呼吸道感染的效果对比.docVIP

炎琥宁与利巴韦林治疗小儿急性上呼吸道感染的效果 对比 ［摘要］日的对比分析炎琥宁与利巴韦林治疗小儿急性上呼吸道感 染的临床效果。方法 选取2012年1月?2014年1月本院收治的203例 小儿急性上呼吸道感染患儿，随机分为研究组（102例）和对照组（101 例）。研究组在常规对症支持治疗的基础上给予炎琥宁治疗，对照组在常 规对症支持治疗的基础上给?了利巴韦林治疗。分析比较两组患儿临床症状 体征消失时间及治疗效果，并观察治疗期间的不良反应。结果 研究组的 症状体征消失时间明显短于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P0. 05）；研究 组的治疗总有效率为94.12%,对照组的治疗总有效率为76.23%,差异有 统计学意义（P〈0?05）；两组患儿均未出现严重不良反应，研究组不良反 应较对照组少且轻微。结论炎琥宁注射液能有效治疗小儿急性上呼吸道 感染，并且具有治疗时间短、不良反应少的特点，安全可靠，具有重耍的 临床价值，值得推广应用。 ［关键词］炎琥宁；利巴韦林；小儿急性上呼吸道感染 ［中图分类号］R725. 6 ［文献标识码］A ［文章编号］1674-4721 （2014） 09 （b） -0096-03 Effect comparison of Yanhuning and ribavirin in treatment of chilclren with acute respiratory infection WEI Yue-ru Department of Pediatrics, People s Hospital of Guixi City in Jiangxi Province, Guixi 335400, China [Abstract] Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of Yanhuning and ribavirin in the treatment of children with acute respiratory infection. Methods 203 children with acute respiratory infection admitted to our hospital from January 2012 to January 2014 were selected and randomly divided into the study group ( 102 patients) and the control group (101 patients) . The study group were given with Yanhuning treatment on the basis of conventional symptomatic supportive treatment, the control group were given with ribavirin treatment on the basis of conventional symptomatic supportive treatment. The disappearance time of clinicol symptoms and signs and the treatment effects of the two groups were analyzed comparatively, and the adverse reactions during the treatment period were observed? Results The disappearance time of various symptoms and signs of the study group was shorter than that of the control group , with significant differenee between the two groups (P0.05)? The total effective rate of the study group was 94. 12% and that of the control group was 76. 23%, the total effective rate of the study group was higher than that of the control group, with significant differenee between the two groups (P0. 05) . No severe adverse reactions occurred in the two grou