新视野大学英语4第三版unit8 section a课件.pptVIP

新视野大学英语4第三版unit8 section a课件.ppt

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Unit 8 Animals or Children? ----- A scientists choice Animals Children scientist choice Or the style of the essay? Argumentation What happens to them? Experiment What happens to them? Rescue a doctor General understanding  The text is an _________________________, the purpose of which is to convince readers by using good ___________ and strong ____________. The author, through writing this essay, argues for his rightfulness of doing ____________________. argumentative essay reasons evidence animal research General understanding Structure his love for children and his strong desire to keep them healthy. According to the text, why did the author become a children’s doctor? (Para.1) He was accused of doing animal researches. What happened to the author? (Para.1) Part I — (Para. 1) The author was _________________________of being cruel to animals, but in fact his top desire is only to keep children healthy with ______________________based on ______________________. wrongly accused medical advances animal research How did animal rights activists describe the researchers? (Para.2) distort the truth How does society react to the animal rights issue? (Para.2) The public barely watches, convinced that the issue has no significance to them , while the senators and politicians continue to give way to the lobbying of animal rights activists. indifference What did physician scientists do? (Para.3) Response be unbelievably uncaring allow them to creep in “animal fraud” and hatred Why? Belief A knowledgeable public would consent to the importance of animal research for public health Not respond to the emotional tone of the argument Consequence: be mistaken What should be done? …respond to the activists’ tone by waving equally sad posters of children dying of cancer or external wounds Part II — Paras. 2-3 This part unfolds the current situation of animal-rights movement. Firstly, animal rights protectors distort the truth by accusing the physician of doing

文档评论(0)

LF20190802 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档