Q5英语四六级雅思托福考研GRE高考GMAT大小作文宝典策略技巧范文模板.docVIP

P： M在任：1 2 3；V在任：12 C best served P1 + P2 ====C M不好+V好==best serve 1M不一定不好 2 V不一定好 3 即使M真不好即使V真好，不一定best serve 1 人口下降 作者可能在假设“人口下降说明M执政能力不行，不给力” 错误 人口下降——不是因为M执政能力不行——社会背景 X Or 人口下降反而说明M执政能力很棒——birth control【人口多 本来财政负担就大】 1' 失业率升高 1'' 公司倒闭 2 V在任的时候人口上升 同样的错误 3 通过社会现状说明MV 的能力 MV都是凭自己的能力造成的目前的现状 错误 “市场经济滞后性”——【大萧条的案例】 柯立芝繁荣——GREAT DEPRESSION C H F.R 3’ 以偏概全 M 人口 失业率 企业倒闭，证明市长好不好 I 这三个因素是决定市长能力的全部 P 以偏概全too narrow in scope E 犯罪率 就业率 企业的创办和收益 4 即使M确实不行 但不代表V一定现在就行【外推】 V 老年痴呆 V 对于当前经济不了解【V擅长工业， 现在SP已经进入服务业主导阶段】 SP would not be best served. 特殊套路1主体段安排 1 P1 不一定成立 2 P2 不一定成立 3 即使P1 P2成立 仍需考虑其他因素 否则不能推出C 1 The author presented such societal situation as population decrease during the four years since M had taken office. This factor was intended to inform us that Actually the assumption might be problematic. If, for example, the decrease of P was due to inevitable disasters such as XXX and OOO, it would not be M's responsibility for these issue. We could even consider those changes as indicators for M's capability since the effect of birth control has decreased the population and therefore the financial burden of SP. THUS the author would have to make further interpretation on how these affairs indicate the disqualification of M.